This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other
content posted on it.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks.
If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a
ban.Enjoy.
Bloomfield
Posted by Music Critic on 12/8/2025, 9:16:12
Doing well with an unbalanced squad that still needs work
I still feel we need 2 specialist full backs/wing backs and a creative midfielder or 2
And, maybe, another wide or central forward although that's more of a nice to have
Get that right and I fancy us strongly
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by RGDave on 12/8/2025, 9:31:11, in reply to "Bloomfield"
Interesting that those who moaned incessantly all summer about the club; Sweet, incoming players etc. have faded away. It must be frustrating for them that we've won a couple of games. It was ever thus.
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by bbb on 12/8/2025, 10:05:48, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
Nope. Still here. 2 wins against piss poor opposition, only about 35 mins of reasonable football. There are clearly signs of improvement but if Temu Levy actually spent some money on the areas of the squad that even Stevie Wonder can see need improvements, we'd be in a far better place.
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by Ronnies Finger on 12/8/2025, 11:45:11, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
Take a happy pill for Christs sake…
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by bbb on 12/8/2025, 11:48:14, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
I'll do that if you take a cyanide pill. Deal?
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by old hat on 12/8/2025, 10:31:48, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
Yes lets splash millions because it guarantees good players who fit in like Giles and Chong.
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by Ostrich spotter on 12/8/2025, 11:41:45, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
Fcuking arsewipe. No one is saying that. They still won't let you into the clique
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by TheDunstableWindsock on 12/8/2025, 17:31:22, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
bbb seems to.be saying exactly that but then, by his own admission, he is spaz cunt.
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by bbb on 12/8/2025, 20:15:36, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
Coming from the biggest dribbling spastic on this board? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 brilliant 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by Ramridge Raider on 12/8/2025, 12:16:29, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
I can't help but think our recruitment team have dropped the ball again. Doughty was always going to leave so that wouldn't have been a surprise. Isiah injury is shit but we've had a few weeks to respond. Walters has potential but is nowhere near wing-back level.
Midfield seems a bit hit and hope. Saville is a decent signing but is not particularly creative. Baptiste may be decent but can he put a run of games together. Fanne is purely potential at this stage, Walsh is Walsh and Clark is top quality at this level but his legs seem to be going.
Just seens there are lots of ifs, buts and maybes at the moment. I'm not advocating spending stupid money but I'd like to think we will be investing in these key positions before the window closes.
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by Ostrich spotter on 12/8/2025, 12:23:03, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
I think that is exactly what most are saying. We need more creativity from full/wing backs and midfield. Accepting the party line we wanted to build a team around Aasgaard and we had no option to sell him, it does seem strange we haven't yet replaced him (and before old hat misunderstands again, I am not advocating spending millions). Unless, we believe we have got to the bottom of Baptiste's injury problems? Even if we have, still think we would need cover unless Nelson is going to kick on?
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by Music Critic on 12/8/2025, 12:42:06, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
Even if we have, still think we would need cover unless Nelson is going to kick on?
That bloke from Rotherham can play that position too. But, of course, he's injured!
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by Music Critic on 12/8/2025, 10:46:08, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
It's not one thing or another, though, is it? It's not a case of spending millions or nothing. There is an in-between
You're right to say that spending a few quid on those two, that you mention, were quite expensive mistakes by our recruitment team
But, just cos mistakes have been made, it doesn't mean we shouldn't spend money on the weak areas of the squad. And it is obvious that at full back/wing back (and in attacking midfield) we are not strong enough
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by bbb on 12/8/2025, 10:45:11, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
Yeah, we signed a couple of duds. That means we should never spend a single penny ever again eh? Ffs.
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by Music Critic on 12/8/2025, 10:20:41, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
Yep.
The way I see it is we have a manager who has, generally, proved that he can be trusted*. So, we should back him
*WBA aside but the players didn't help there either
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by Music Critic on 12/8/2025, 9:36:07, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
Well, I've had my moans too. A double relegation from the Prem should never have happened
But we are where we are and seem to have a manager that knows what he's doing
The club needs to back Bloomfield to recruit quality in those positions I highlighted and we'll be top 2 I reckon
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by Farhat on 12/8/2025, 9:48:58, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
In the 2 league games we've only played reasonably well for 45 minutes, against 2 clubs who will struggle. On the plus side we can only improve, our defence is looking solid, and - of course - we can only beat what's in front of us. What I noticed at Peterborough was how positive our support really is. Feels like we're building connections again.
Re: Bloomfield
Posted by Music Critic on 12/8/2025, 9:54:09, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"
Yes, in defensive areas (midfield and at the back) we look good. But we can't spend a season just making do at full back/wing back and creating so little
Still suspect Bloomfield would like to go 4 at the back. Hence the need for proper full backs
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board
administration.
Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton
Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or
anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any
other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.
on 12/8/2025, 9:16:12