Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil

This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

Posh's double-touched goal kick

Posted by PHS <iframe src='https://members.boardhost.com/lutonoutlaws/info/user=PHS' width='330' height='300' border=0 style='border:none;'> on 10/8/2025, 16:07:31

Am I correct that the punishment for the Posh GK's double-touched goal kick should have been an indirect free kick?

I noticed that MB was going NJ (but not full NJ) at the referee when it wasn't given.

Re: Posh's double-touched goal kick

Posted by MG <iframe src='https://members.boardhost.com/lutonoutlaws/info/user=MG' width='330' height='300' border=0 style='border:none;'> on 10/8/2025, 19:02:10, in reply to "Posh's double-touched goal kick"

Yes, that's right, indirect free kick.

Re: Posh's double-touched goal kick

Posted by Floater <iframe src='https://members.boardhost.com/lutonoutlaws/info/user=Floater' width='330' height='300' border=0 style='border:none;'> on 10/8/2025, 16:38:14, in reply to "Posh's double-touched goal kick"

At this level, I doubt if a referee would spot a goalkeeper passing to himself.

I think Posh will need to replace that keeper if they want to stay up. Dozy, and seemed to put a load of kicks into touch.

Re: Posh's double-touched goal kick

Posted by Rioch for England <iframe src='https://members.boardhost.com/lutonoutlaws/info/user=Rioch+for+England' width='330' height='300' border=0 style='border:none;'> on 10/8/2025, 18:23:48, in reply to "Re: Posh's double-touched goal kick"

Good that the ref wasn't conned by the circus-act dive and penalty appeal, but he should have booked the bloke. Probably didn't want to add to his embarrassment.

Re: Posh's double-touched goal kick

Posted by The Outsider <iframe src='https://members.boardhost.com/lutonoutlaws/info/user=The+Outsider' width='330' height='300' border=0 style='border:none;'> on 10/8/2025, 19:04:31, in reply to "Re: Posh's double-touched goal kick"
VIP

Unlike his decision on the other occasion that he has refereed us.

https://www.skysports.com/football/sunderland-vs-luton-town/report/468277

Mowbray's comments were as near to an admission as you are likely to get.

Re: Posh's double-touched goal kick

Posted by MG <iframe src='https://members.boardhost.com/lutonoutlaws/info/user=MG' width='330' height='300' border=0 style='border:none;'> on 10/8/2025, 19:01:18, in reply to "Re: Posh's double-touched goal kick"

They were pretty keen on hitting the deck and pretending to be injured all game.

« Back to index

[ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

DISCLAIMER

The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.