This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other
content posted on it.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks.
If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a
ban.Enjoy.
Woodrow/Nordas
Posted by Ramridge Raider on 26/7/2025, 19:33:19
I'm sure we are all desperate for them to succeed but the harsh reality is that neither are anywhere near good enough.
Woodrow does not have the physicality or pace to play League One. I would say he is probably Conference level these days.
I can't even say the jury is out on Nordas. He's not demonstrated anything to prove he should be a professional football player. Won two headers today from keepers punts and that about his highlights.
bbb said he looks like someone who won the raffle to play in a professional football match. He's absolutely spot on.
Re: Woodrow/Nordas
Posted by J in C on 27/7/2025, 8:46:42, in reply to "Woodrow/Nordas" Sarah
How many games are you judging Nordas on thenLegend
Re: Woodrow/Nordas
Posted by Ramridge Raider on 27/7/2025, 9:44:23, in reply to "Re: Woodrow/Nordas"
Based on virtually every game he has started or came on as sub.
Like I say, I desperately want him to succeed but I'm struggling to see any evidence that he has what is required.
You keep stating he'll score fifteen this season. Is that just to be controversial and edgy or is there something you've seen that us mere mortals haven't?
Re: Woodrow/Nordas
Posted by bbb on 27/7/2025, 3:39:15, in reply to "Woodrow/Nordas"
I usually am. More people on here need to understand that.
Re: Woodrow/Nordas
Posted by Father Ted on 26/7/2025, 20:02:18, in reply to "Woodrow/Nordas"
Whoever signed off on his multi million pound transfer fee needs their head looking at. Agree with the Woodrow analysis, he's long passed his best.
Re: Woodrow/Nordas
Posted by Winger on 26/7/2025, 19:36:18, in reply to "Woodrow/Nordas"
Unfortunately, I agree with you word for word.
Neither are the answer, neither have showed anything close to being good enough.
It was well know already but this pre-season it has been even more glaringly obvious.
I am still suggesting Cheek, but surely we must have someone arriving imminently?
Re: Woodrow/Nordas
Posted by Ramridge Raider on 26/7/2025, 20:00:19, in reply to "Re: Woodrow/Nordas"
Cheek is a bit of a 'fox in the box' at lower league level. Just doesn't have the pace or physicality required at this level so would struggle hugely.
We need a physical presence upfront who will be able to link up play and create for our attacking midfielders. Wells looks decent but needs to play off a more physical strike partner. Same if Alli is played upfront.
On a slightly different note. If Clark is to play as a ten, Bloomfield needs to tell him he is not good enough to take players on. The amount of times he loses the ball on the edge of the opposition area is becoming a liability.
Lovely player but doesn't have the pace anymore to go past a player.
Posted by Floater on 26/7/2025, 19:43:13, in reply to "Re: Woodrow/Nordas"
Cheeky loan deal with Spurs for Will Lankshear?
After all, a chance meeting with a Wolves coach while Bloomfield was on holiday helped secure Big Nige's signature
Re: Woodrow/Nordas
Posted by Sixtiesfan on 26/7/2025, 20:27:56, in reply to "Re: Woodrow/Nordas"
Woodrow has been a decent player but that is just it. "Has been" As for Nordas. Not much to say.The old saying is "if you have got nothing good to say,say nothing" So I won't.
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board
administration.
Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton
Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or
anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any
other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.
on 26/7/2025, 19:33:19
