This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other
content posted on it.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks.
If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a
ban.Enjoy.
Rachel Tears
Posted by Short n curly on 2/7/2025, 15:18:39
Should we feel sorry for her or not ?
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by Hoofit on 2/7/2025, 21:23:19, in reply to "Rachel Tears "
Probably the smell of Amyl Nitrate from Starmers arsehole that brought tears to her eyes.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by Voice of reason on 2/7/2025, 19:21:33, in reply to "Rachel Tears "
Absolutely not. She’s an evil bitch and so is Raynor, and Starmer is a lying useless twat. Surely there must be a couple of intelligent beings in the Labour Party to come up with some sensible plans and stop lying about mythical black holes, and ripping off the old and the poor. Perhaps they might use their enormous salaries to pay their own bills and stop claiming£8k each for heating a second home.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by Well on 2/7/2025, 19:27:01, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
Nothing new then although I can’t remember you in the last 15 years of hell.
“Mythical black hole” ? Please provide evidence considering every serious institution in this country knows it’s bankrupt.
As for her I don’t give a rats arse.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by Andy Cappuccino on 2/7/2025, 16:43:03, in reply to "Rachel Tears "
Karma for the fuel allowance, she needs to grow a pair for a job in politics
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by J Block OAP on 2/7/2025, 16:16:52, in reply to "Rachel Tears "
If, as reported, she was upset by a fall out with the Speaker, then absolutely not. She's the Chancellor ffs, and needs to toughen. If that's not the creasing and it's some personal issue,then maybe she should have stayed away
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by Wilt on 2/7/2025, 15:37:39, in reply to "Rachel Tears "
Absolutely not.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by PaddyHatter on 2/7/2025, 15:33:57, in reply to "Rachel Tears "
I feel sorry for her. However Labour are starting to realise that Governing a country post 2008/2020/Ukraine financial disasters is not easy. Not easy at all ! Wait until AI starts hitting the jobs market. Whoever is chancellor will really cry then !
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by Zaphod on 2/7/2025, 15:23:32, in reply to "Rachel Tears "
She has upset large numbers of Labour backbenchers, I suspect that her days as Chancellor are numbered.
Do feel a bit sorry for her, very tough job for anyone, our economy is a wreck, destroyed by increased debt and debt servicing costs.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by SAHB on 2/7/2025, 15:22:40, in reply to "Rachel Tears "
MPs are human too.
And no matter what people say it must be stressful. What kind of fool would follow signs that were never there.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by Ostrich spotter on 3/7/2025, 10:47:44, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
But it was so much easier in opposition. Reality hits hard
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by The Questioner on 2/7/2025, 17:52:43, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
She deserves no pity if it’s to do with her work…her spiteful budget delivered with a stupid grin on her face was typical of her being a key member of the party of envy. This latest fiasco is going to mean further tax rises in the Autumn budget ….from the party who said they wouldn’t raise taxes.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by SAHB on 2/7/2025, 20:41:24, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
I hope it does mean there are tax rises, the super rich should help out a bit more.
Fair play to those that stood up for those on disability allowance.
Why has successive governments targeted the poorest in our community when the gap between rich and poor is growing all the time.?
What kind of fool would follow signs that were never there.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by The Questioner on 2/7/2025, 21:25:48, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
The super rich are all fucking off mate ….it will be those that are trying to get up the ladder who will be hit.
Are the poor getting poorer ?
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by Well on 2/7/2025, 21:46:07, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
I take it you believe the disabled and genuinely sick should have benefits slashed?
At the same time rambling about how hard millionaire farmers have it.
Comedy gold.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by The Questioner on 2/7/2025, 22:28:00, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
No I don’t and didn’t say that.
Just as stupid as those on the right saying everyone on be is doing it fraudulent are those on the left thinking that all farmers are millionaires.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by Well on 2/7/2025, 22:53:13, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
Great stuff.
Thank god tor real labour MPs eh.
Glad we agree.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by PaddyHatter on 2/7/2025, 17:45:10, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
Starmer isn't.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by Farhat on 2/7/2025, 15:20:22, in reply to "Rachel Tears "
If it's personal, it's none of our business.
If she's been sacked or has resigned, then no.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by The Outsider on 2/7/2025, 15:31:17, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears " VIP
It sounds as though the personal reasons are that she was upset because the speaker told her twice yesterday afternoon to give shorter answers.
I think that sacking her could end up being the only answer as it would allow a replacement to set their own rules which are easier to stick to whereas for her to change her rules would be seen as backtracking on her "non negotiable red lines".
How much political capital have Labour wasted on this bill, which achieves the square root of fuck all?
Just hurts a lot of people and will barely save any money.
They're all fucking pissed in no 10.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by The Questioner on 2/7/2025, 17:41:50, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
With the changes they have made to appease the rebels it has actually cost us more money….you couldn’t make that shit up.
Two things piss me off about politics in our country (I guess it’s the same in other countries as well) . Firstly I suspect many Tories would have agreed with the changes in its original context as it was effectively reducing wealth fair but because it wasn’t their idea they have to vote against it ( this happens across all parties btw ). Secondly over 100 mps failed to vote ….thats fucking disgraceful…lazy bastards.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by The Outsider on 2/7/2025, 17:55:08, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears " VIP
Same with WFA - by the time you add on all the admin costs of people opting out, people altering it through their tax return, P800s for those who don't do tax returns and appeals, it will cost more than just giving to all state pensioners.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by RADSB on 2/7/2025, 15:44:51, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
Clueless Tories get replaced by clueless Labour. None of them have any attachment to real life, no talent, no charisma.
I went to the David Lloyd George Museum last week, one of our greatest politicians. He was in touch with the common man and did some great things for the country. He also made some huge errors so the message is that no politician can be perfect. But the last 20 years has been a conveyor belt of utter morons. Mr J.C. Lomax having been called upon to give his opinion upon the proposed formation of a Town Club, said he was most emphatically in favour of a proposed Luton Town Football Club - 11th April 1885
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by Farhat on 2/7/2025, 16:20:26, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
"But the last 20 years has been a conveyor belt of utter morons."
Absolutely, but the voters still keep voting for them.
Re: Rachel Tears
Posted by bbb on 2/7/2025, 16:53:11, in reply to "Re: Rachel Tears "
Fear not, don't stress. Grab a nice cold beer from the fridge, sit down and relax. Rupert Lowe will step up and take control and all the last 20 years will become just a distant memory chum.
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board
administration.
Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton
Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or
anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any
other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.
on 2/7/2025, 15:18:39
