This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

    Bloomfield

    Posted by TopH on 8/3/2025, 17:08:53

    I think/hope long term he might workout ,but can't help thinking a more experienced manager would have come in played some sort of formation that had a back 4 with 1 sitting in front and tried to grind out points until the end of the season.

      Re: Bloomfield

      Posted by Hatters88 on 8/3/2025, 17:48:22, in reply to "Bloomfield"

      We did do that for the first couple of MB's games but I think he realised quite quickly we have no full backs good enough.

        Re: Bloomfield

        Posted by Trap 4 on 8/3/2025, 17:12:45, in reply to "Bloomfield"

        Maybe, maybe not, we’ll never knis

          Re: Bloomfield

          Posted by E5 Hat on 8/3/2025, 17:13:41, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"

          We know - MBs won one game...

            Re: Bloomfield

            Posted by Trap 4 on 8/3/2025, 17:13:02, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"

            Know

            Re: Bloomfield

            Posted by Alan17 on 8/3/2025, 17:12:21, in reply to "Bloomfield"

            Don't blame Bloomfield. Blame those that gave him the job.

              Re: Bloomfield

              Posted by bbb on 8/3/2025, 17:12:16, in reply to "Bloomfield"

              No one experienced was ever going to come in.
              Sweet and his ego wanted a yes man.

                Re: Bloomfield

                Posted by Alan17 on 8/3/2025, 17:17:37, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"

                More likely, Sweet wanted somebody on the cheap.

                  Re: Bloomfield

                  Posted by Trindle and Buffoon on 8/3/2025, 17:21:02, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"

                  No, a "yes man" was the first criterion on the JD.

                    Re: Bloomfield

                    Posted by HuN on 8/3/2025, 17:20:42, in reply to "Re: Bloomfield"

                    The Board probably jumped at employing the first guy that showed any interest

              [ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

              DISCLAIMER

              The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

              Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

                Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

                What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.

              eXTReMe Tracker