This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other
content posted on it.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks.
If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a
ban.Enjoy.
FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Mental Rabbit on 12/9/2024, 16:19:26
A
Wouldn’t you think a pre-requisite for a £1.35m pay packet is hard work?
CIA
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by James the cultured one on 12/9/2024, 16:43:59, in reply to "FAO: crumpsall"
Who hasn't worked hard then
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Mental Rabbit on 12/9/2024, 19:52:14, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Don’t get involved, do your crayoning
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Madpig on 12/9/2024, 16:36:38, in reply to "FAO: crumpsall"
Are we talking Sweet here? Were you the one who suggested last year we sack him for getting promotion to the Prem? Was anyone suggesting it? Probably not eh? I still trust his ability.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by crumpsall on 12/9/2024, 16:29:03, in reply to "FAO: crumpsall"
I'm not sure I want to be commenting on anyone's income on here, whether true or not.
What I will say is there's a shitload of people who do fuck all and get a lot more than that!
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Mental Rabbit on 12/9/2024, 19:45:30, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Posted by EastEnder on 12/9/2024, 19:25:41, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Pwrhwps we should get a nurse to run the club, then?
Believe me, John Mitchell took a lot more money out of rh3 club a year than that amount.
Be careful what you wish for if you ate trying to atart some sprt of Sweet out camaapign based on how much tou thibk he earns (which woukd havw ibckuded a significant bonus for promotion to the Premier League).
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by The Questioner on 13/9/2024, 10:26:00, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
I don’t think he did EE….we didn’t have any money….not defending him and his ilk and it wasn’t for want of trying to take money out.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by The Outsider on 13/9/2024, 10:42:35, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Didn't have any money?
Have a look at the players we sold while he was involved.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by The Questioner on 14/9/2024, 10:14:13, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
To counter that have a look at our wage bill. SWC pulled the plug on bank rolling the club leaving a wage bill that was 3x our income. We had to sell players, plenty of people ( I suspect you included) looked at the accounts at the time.
My point was related to the poster further above saying that others who do less earn more than GS.
A ridiculous argument.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Mental Rabbit on 12/9/2024, 19:51:15, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
If you’re going to post lies could you at least write in English.
How can it be justifiable to have a so called supporter earning in the top 0.05% of people in the country at a so called working class club who aren’t going to go Billy big bollocks.
David Kohler didn’t take the piss to this extent, and he didn’t have other peoples money to play with.
Maybe reducing the corporate wage budget could mean they don’t raise ticket prices every year ?
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by The Outsider on 12/9/2024, 21:08:37, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
David Kohler didn’t take the piss to this extent, and he didn’t have other peoples money to play with.
It's the people whose money he is "playing with" that decide his salary and bonuses. He doesn't just decide them for himself.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Mental Rabbit on 12/9/2024, 21:53:23, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
You should declare your conflict of interest when posting
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by The Outsider on 12/9/2024, 22:54:14, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Which conflict of interest is that?
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by EastEnder on 12/9/2024, 21:00:23, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
You flid Kohler 2 relegations.
No new geound. Club went into admin.
Sweet 4 promotions, financially stable and a new stadium on the way.
2020 are the best thing that ever hsopened to Luton Town ane they only exist because of Gary Sweet.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Mental Rabbit on 12/9/2024, 20:14:51, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Last 3 years at least.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by James the cultured one on 13/9/2024, 2:26:00, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Do you munch crayons are they nice
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Pork Pie Spotter on 12/9/2024, 20:20:05, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
liar
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Madpig on 12/9/2024, 20:09:22, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Kohler? Ok, this is a wind up. Good one 🤞
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Doctor Ince on 12/9/2024, 20:01:03, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
They don't raise ticket prices every year do they? St prices rose this year but didn't for a while before that.
If the wage is true it's pretty fair for a company with a turnover of Lutons I'd say
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by EastEnder on 12/9/2024, 21:03:10, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
They did last year but we were in Prem.
And this year they did but more home games than last season.
And only modest increases they certainly did not take the piss in the Prem last season.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Godders on 12/9/2024, 22:59:23, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Match day prices are less this season than last season. £29 adult category b match which was £33 last season.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by joey diconio on 12/9/2024, 22:19:16, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
increase for less games
Increase for more games
Immoral
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Kitman on 13/9/2024, 6:26:01, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Actually if you net off inflation over the last 3 years ticket prices have reduced. Fact.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Swiss Tony on 12/9/2024, 20:03:29, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
That’s my boy!
🤪🥴
Swiss
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by crumpsall on 12/9/2024, 16:31:48, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Relevance??
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Godders on 12/9/2024, 17:00:23, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
I think the general point is that lots of low paid workers work their arses off for little renumeration. A point that I'm sure you'd agree on. Likewise you're point about some who do sod all and yet get paid far more.
In terms of relevance I think the issue is that money is a commodity rather than a reward ie the harder you work rarely equals the pay you receive.
Whether that's morally and ethical fair or right is a slightly different issue.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by EastEnder on 12/9/2024, 19:31:35, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Isn't that the point of capitalism?
Gary works for a business which has been very successful for years, relative to its previous recent history, so was paid a salary and bonus that the club could well afford.
Any of you could have saved the club and insalled yourself as MD if you had the nous, but you didn't.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Nearly s Genius on 12/9/2024, 19:34:11, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
“if you had the nous and the capital”
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by EastEnder on 12/9/2024, 19:59:49, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
And the contacts I guess.
It wasn't his money but it's far harder than most would think to put a consortium of people with money together.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Nearly s Genius on 12/9/2024, 20:06:12, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
I imagine it is. And 2020, including GS, deserve all the plaudits they get,
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Depressed Deidre on 12/9/2024, 18:52:58, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
What's renumeration?
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by The Outsider on 12/9/2024, 19:07:57, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
Giving new numbers to something?
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by crumpsall on 12/9/2024, 17:06:38, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
I think that bringing our underpaid nurses into this thread was/is of no relevance to the point 'Mental Rabbit' was/is trying to make.
I suspect we would be in 100% agreement about overall principles.
Re: FAO: crumpsall
Posted by Godders on 12/9/2024, 17:14:03, in reply to "Re: FAO: crumpsall"
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board
administration.
Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton
Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or
anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any
other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.
