This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

    Olympic boxing

    Posted by Hatsworth on 8/8/2024, 1:21:35

    I know fcuk all about boxing and even less about genetics* - so I’m perfectly placed to comment it seems.

    Surely the issue here is that if someone who genetically has the strength of a man fight someone that is 100% a woman, that woman is at a disproportionate risk of serious injury. This isn’t tiddlywinks or the 800m, it’s punching each other in the head until the opponent can’t stand up. So whist it’s clearly going to be rotten not to be allowed to compete for something that isn’t a fault (let alone your fault), it’s not as rotten as, say, increased risk of brain damage or, like, death?

    Or am I missing something? Boxing already has weight limits, so if we are saying that generics don’t matter should there be gender categories at all (of course there fcuking should, but the logic prevails).


    * I do seem to have become a bit of an expert in insomnia recently though.

      Re: Olympic boxing

      Posted by City Gent on 8/8/2024, 9:07:20, in reply to "Olympic boxing"

      So by your logic, Mike Tyson should have been banned as well?

        Re: Olympic boxing

        Posted by Toddingtonsteve on 8/8/2024, 8:06:28, in reply to "Olympic boxing"

        Trouble is, all sportspeople are thus because they are more genetically athletic than other people, so where does that argument stop. She’s a woman by birth and has been beaten 9 times by females.

          Re: Olympic boxing

          Posted by Hatsworth on 8/8/2024, 9:21:47, in reply to "Re: Olympic boxing"

          I do agree with you.

          Flip side is this. Say the opponent ended up with serious injuries, say permanent brain damage - how would the sport governing body explain it to that persons family? And less importantly, what would a liability court case look like (other than complex!).

          I think that boxing is something of a unique example in this case, due to the means of “winning” and the associated risk.

            Re: Olympic boxing

            Posted by Wat Tyler on 8/8/2024, 9:30:38, in reply to "Re: Olympic boxing"

            Other than a discredited claim by the discredited IBA, what evidence is there that Khelif isn’t a woman or has a “genetic advantage” over her opponents?

              Re: Olympic boxing

              Posted by Sir Keir Starmer on 8/8/2024, 9:57:06, in reply to "Re: Olympic boxing"

              I can't help at all on this one I'm afraid.

                Re: Olympic boxing

                Posted by jimmyp on 8/8/2024, 10:38:48, in reply to "Re: Olympic boxing"

                So you keep saying.

                Let's have the definition, then. Since it's so easy.

                Cheers, Jim

                  Re: Olympic boxing

                  Posted by Actually on 8/8/2024, 10:06:37, in reply to "Re: Olympic boxing"

                  Or anything else for that matter. You useless twat.

                    Re: Olympic boxing

                    Posted by jimmyp on 8/8/2024, 10:47:50, in reply to "Re: Olympic boxing"

                    Saved us from spending any more hundreds of millions on trying to swap a few hundred migrants with those deemed to be too unsavoury to stay in Rwanda.

                    Shame so many hundreds of millions had been wasted on it already, rather than actually trying to do something to solve the issue but that's not on him.

                    Cheers, Jim

            Re: Olympic boxing

            Posted by Alien Nate on 8/8/2024, 7:16:49, in reply to "Olympic boxing"

            You shouldn't put yourself down, just because you don't have the knowledge of boxing, or genetics.
            You clearly are an expert on common sense.
            👽

          [ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

          DISCLAIMER

          The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

          Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

            Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

            What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.

          eXTReMe Tracker