This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

    Matt macey

    Posted by Wighthatter on 29/5/2024, 8:04:09

    Going to Colchester, didn't get a look in at pompey, kept out by norris. Looks like hibs were right. Still 🤣🤣🤣💰💰💰

      Re: Matt macey

      Posted by Yes on 29/5/2024, 8:11:30, in reply to "Matt macey"

      How much did that clown Jones spend on him?

        Re: Matt macey

        Posted by Eddie on 29/5/2024, 9:05:10, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

        Not as much as Edward’s spent on Giles

          Re: Matt macey

          Posted by Observer on 29/5/2024, 16:38:05, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

          I would have thought you’d be able to spell Edwards correctly considering it’s part of your name.

          Although given how fuckwitted your contributions are, I guess it’s no surprise.

            Re: Matt macey

            Posted by The Real Anon on 29/5/2024, 9:08:35, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

            Or maybe even Hashioka 🤐

              Re: Matt macey

              Posted by Peter Griffin on 29/5/2024, 9:45:17, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

              What fućktards you both are, do you have any point in your sad pathetic lives?

                Re: Matt macey

                Posted by pingu on 29/5/2024, 9:09:28, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                fukk me - yous should be embarrassed to call yourselves luton fans.

                  Re: Matt macey

                  Posted by crumpsall on 29/5/2024, 9:15:45, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                  Do these shitheads think they're being funny, or clever - slagging the manager and our own player? Beggars belief.

                    Re: Matt macey

                    Posted by Mike on 29/5/2024, 10:07:41, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                    He's entitled to his opinion

                      Re: Matt macey

                      Posted by crumpsall on 29/5/2024, 10:20:13, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                      Yep. And I'm entitled to have an opinion on that opinion.

                      Which is that people slating our manager and a player at this time is utter dogshite twatishness.

                      Okay by you, 'Mike'? Most of what you post under your multiple names attacks the club, players and town too, so I have a similar opinion of you and your posts.

                        Re: Matt macey

                        Posted by U on 29/5/2024, 10:32:52, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                        but but but, you're not allowed to have a political opinion on Ourlaws which is slightly to the right of Stalin, Trotsky, Ceausescu, oh and Corbyn.

                          Re: Matt macey

                          Posted by crumpsall on 29/5/2024, 10:37:36, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                          It would appear that since yesterday no political opinions are allowed squire.

                          And as expressing anything that isn't hard right is considered by some to be hard right, that's perhaps reasonable. Shame it comes at the cost of grown-up debate.

                            Re: Matt macey

                            Posted by U on 29/5/2024, 10:41:36, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                            spot on

                              Re: Matt macey

                              Posted by crumpsall on 29/5/2024, 10:45:52, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                              I actually meant to type:

                              'And as expressing anything that isn't hard right is considered by some to be hard left'

                              But I'm sure you would agree with the overall point that such polarised characterisation prevents aforementioned grown-up debate.

                                Re: Matt macey

                                Posted by Doctor Ince on 29/5/2024, 11:05:58, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                This is the internet
                                It's either X or it's Y

                        Re: Matt macey

                        Posted by Andy Cappuccino on 29/5/2024, 10:16:49, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                        Agreed, everyone is entitled to their opinion and should not be shouted down by others who don't agree

                          Re: Matt macey

                          Posted by crumpsall on 29/5/2024, 10:22:01, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                          Shouted down? Are people not allowed to disagree with those who disagree then? Confused in Crumpsall..

                            Re: Matt macey

                            Posted by Andy Cappuccino on 29/5/2024, 11:28:53, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                            I think using the term 'shitheads' counts as shouting down in my book, or have you forgotten that already?

                              Re: Matt macey

                              Posted by crumpsall on 29/5/2024, 11:34:02, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                              How is using an insult in response to a post 'shouting someone down'? Seriously - do you actually understand what the expression means?

                                Re: Matt macey

                                Posted by crumpsall on 29/5/2024, 11:37:26, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                And as an aside, I didn't even say it to the poster(s) in question but as a reply to Pingu!!!

                              Re: Matt macey

                              Posted by Dally Duncan's Barmy Army on 29/5/2024, 10:36:02, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                              The difference is that the people saying a player is rubbish (in their opinion - and in my opinion valid to date on Hashioka) don't all pile on (see always several poster replies) and tell the others to f off, support another club, call the all cnuts etc etc.

                              Whereas as those expressing the opinion that they disagree with the first poster do...

                              So hardly just expressing an opinions about a player.

                                Re: Matt macey

                                Posted by Ramridge Raider on 29/5/2024, 10:49:14, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                I don't think anyone minds a serious football discussion around the merits (or otherwise) of our players. At the moment though, it seems a number of multi named trolls are just dishing out abuse for attention seeking purposes.

                                Makes them fair game to be told to F... Off and quite frankly, do we really need them as fans.

                                  Re: Matt macey

                                  Posted by Room 101 on 29/5/2024, 10:56:14, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                  Hear worse about our players at the game from paying genuine fans. And not in isolation either.

                                    Re: Matt macey

                                    Posted by pingu on 29/5/2024, 10:57:40, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                    not genuine fans if theyre hammering this group of players.

                                    Re: Matt macey

                                    Posted by pingu on 29/5/2024, 10:50:26, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                    amen

                                    Re: Matt macey

                                    Posted by crumpsall on 29/5/2024, 10:40:33, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                    You lose your point by gross exaggeration in my opinion.


                                    Also, why would someone defending a player, manager etc be told to f off and support another club etc? Makes no sense.

                                  Re: Matt macey

                                  Posted by pingu on 29/5/2024, 10:20:38, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                  you can still call a cnut a cnut. its allowed.

                                    Re: Matt macey

                                    Posted by Mike on 29/5/2024, 10:20:35, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                    About time the boards bully started acting his age not his shoe size..

                                      Re: Matt macey

                                      Posted by crumpsall on 29/5/2024, 10:23:31, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                      Bully? From pretend 'hard man' Mike/Ron/Burnside etc?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

                                  Re: Matt macey

                                  Posted by Wilt on 29/5/2024, 9:45:55, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                  They`re neither, but they are certainly shitheads.

                            Re: Matt macey

                            Posted by Andy Cappuccino on 29/5/2024, 8:57:45, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                            Nothing it was the club's money

                              Re: Matt macey

                              Posted by Dally Duncan's Barmy Army on 29/5/2024, 8:25:17, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                              Waiting for the 'he just needs a pre season gang'....

                                Re: Matt macey

                                Posted by Bored in Flitwick on 29/5/2024, 9:20:25, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                Hey..you watch him improve after a pre season..

                                  Re: Matt macey

                                  Posted by Northern lad on 29/5/2024, 9:19:11, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                  There are countless "goalkeepers" being well paid in the professional game for being useless.

                                  The Leeds 'keeper was an example at Wembley a few days ago. He coceded a poor goal. Had he stayed on his feet instead of going to ground like bambi on ice he could have dived to his right and got at least one hand on the ball.

                                  Macey is one of many who should never be taking money on the pretext of being a goalkeeper.

                                    Re: Matt macey

                                    Posted by Bellend Spotter on 29/5/2024, 9:26:19, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                    Some are just professional benchwarmers. Seems like our old friend Sluga ended up the same.

                                      Re: Matt macey

                                      Posted by Northern lad on 29/5/2024, 11:22:42, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                      Indeed he did yet there are still those who amazingly still maintain him to be the nearest to the best 'keeper we've had since the halcyon days of Ron Baynham.

                                      Incredible.

                                        Re: Matt macey

                                        Posted by Observer on 29/5/2024, 16:41:17, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                        “there are still those who amazingly still maintain him to be the nearest to the best 'keeper we've had since the halcyon days of Ron Baynham.”

                                        Such as??

                                          Re: Matt macey

                                          Posted by crumpsall on 29/5/2024, 11:36:13, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                          Name one person who has ever claimed that. I don't recall any. Tyler may have come in for nonsensical overblown praise like that sometimes, but never Sluga.

                                            Re: Matt macey

                                            Posted by Northern lad on 29/5/2024, 15:25:43, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                            We've not had a 'keeper, for all his faults, and yes, he had some, since he left us, who is/was, as reliable as Tyler, and I include Kaminski in that view.

                                              Re: Matt macey

                                              Posted by Spix Spotter on 29/5/2024, 15:43:40, in reply to "Re: Matt macey"

                                              Stupid old fool

                              [ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

                              DISCLAIMER

                              The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

                              Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

                                Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

                                What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.

                              eXTReMe Tracker