This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other
content posted on it.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks.
If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a
ban.Enjoy.
David Coote
Posted by SE1 Hatter on 28/4/2024, 0:24:06
Hope to never see that cunt reffing us again
Re: David Coote
Posted by Pilkinhio on 28/4/2024, 9:55:45, in reply to "David Coote"
He was dire for both teams yesterday
Re: David Coote
Posted by Rory on 28/4/2024, 10:59:29, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Wolves fan said after , refreshing to see a team who don't use the dark arts.
Re: David Coote
Posted by Ok on 28/4/2024, 11:22:38, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
I bet.
A team that rolls over and has its tummy tickled must be a delight for opposing sides.
That was what disappointed me most in the last couple of games.
No fight or desire.
Re: David Coote
Posted by crumpsall on 28/4/2024, 13:30:48, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
You weren't there yesterday then?
Because what you've posted about it is absolute bollocks
Re: David Coote
Posted by Doctor Ince on 28/4/2024, 13:52:56, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Imo, while I've enjoyed watching us have a go we need a bit of that Pulis at stoke or Dyche at Burnley defensive cuntishness where we get stuck in and slow the game down.
Managers have been complimentary because we give them a game but they still win. Wenger used to moan about Stoke because they got results
Re: David Coote
Posted by Ok on 28/4/2024, 13:41:57, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
You obviously weren’t.
No doubt you were still clapping at midnight.
Re: David Coote
Posted by crumpsall on 28/4/2024, 14:12:14, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
I was - and I was and am pretty pissed off. But your comments about the players yesterday are utter bollocks so I can only assume you weren't there
Re: David Coote
Posted by Yet again. on 28/4/2024, 7:21:33, in reply to "David Coote"
Time after time after time it's the same old story. We lose a game of football and it's the referees fault.
Always looking for a scapegoat instead of accepting that at premiership level we're simply not good enough.
What is it now, one win in twelve, or maybe thirteen, (I've lost count), and almost without exception, reading this board, it's the referee who is to blame.
Nothing to do with our ineptitude in defence, our complete inability to keep just a single clean sheet all season away from home, nothing to do with any of that, it's the fault of poor officiating.
About time you happy clappers pulled your heads out of the sand and accepted the blindingly obvious fact that with the players we have at this level and the lack of investment in the January window it was always going to be a virtual impossible task to avoid a return to the championship.
Re: David Coote
Posted by Herve Baquet on 28/4/2024, 11:04:16, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
That you Cuba?
He wasn't blaming the ref for our defeat. He was saying he was a piss awful ref, who ruined the game. Which is true, and is exactly what he did against Man United.
Re: David Coote
Posted by SE1 Hatter on 28/4/2024, 10:26:31, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
As others pointed out below, I didn’t say that’s we he lost - we definitely deserved to lose overall. Doesn’t change the fact that he’s absolutely useless and in general gives us nothing in games.
Re: David Coote
Posted by Naaaa on 28/4/2024, 8:42:25, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
You forgot about every other team time wasting, feigning injury etc. not to mention Forest and Everton cheating.but we’ve never done any of those.
Re: David Coote
Posted by RADSB on 28/4/2024, 8:22:11, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
SE1 didn't say it was the ref's fault we lost.
Re: David Coote
Posted by Lack of scrutiny spotter on 28/4/2024, 8:19:23, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
+1000000000
The lack of ambition has been underpinned by the “happy clapper” mentality that having a club to support is more important than trying to compete.
They are not mutually exclusive.
Regardless of the playing side why won’t anyone be honest about Powes Court, that is a fundamental to our future and I am incredulous why so few are challenging the narrative.
The “added extras” for Kenilworth Road are a dead giveaway.
Was safe standing really needed???
Re: David Coote
Posted by Ramridge Raider on 28/4/2024, 8:45:26, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
'Was safe standing really needed?'
Odd question. It increased capacity meaning more revenue and more fans being able to watch their football Club in the Premier League.
Not sure what you are trying to imply with the question but I'm pretty sure it has negative connotations.
Re: David Coote
Posted by J in C on 28/4/2024, 8:25:22, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Yes it was
Re: David Coote
Posted by RADSB on 28/4/2024, 8:27:17, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
It's the same bloke replying to himself to add his dumb PC conspiracy shite.
Re: David Coote
Posted by You what mate? on 28/4/2024, 8:36:14, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
What do you mean 'conspiracy shite'?
Re: David Coote
Posted by RADSB on 28/4/2024, 8:41:28, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Read the post.
Re: David Coote
Posted by You what mate? on 28/4/2024, 8:54:53, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
I have, still, what conspiracy shite? Can you point it out please.
Re: David Coote
Posted by RADSB on 28/4/2024, 9:01:14, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
You haven't read it.
Re: David Coote
Posted by You what mate? on 28/4/2024, 9:05:05, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Yes. Yes I have. No conspiracy theories to be seen.
Re: David Coote
Posted by RADSB on 28/4/2024, 9:14:54, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Ho hum.
Re: David Coote
Posted by You what mate? on 28/4/2024, 9:17:10, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
What a strange little person you are. There's literally no conspiracy been posted. Anywhere. Why on earth would you post that? Very odd.
Re: David Coote
Posted by RADSB on 28/4/2024, 9:28:32, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
So hurtful from a new name coward who is unable to comprehend the PC narrative that some on here relentlessly pursue.
Re: David Coote
Posted by You what mate? on 28/4/2024, 9:43:23, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
There is no narrative. Plenty are asking the same questions. There's no conspiracy. There's no deep lying hate for 2020 or GS. Just a few questions that are getting louder the longer it all drags on. What is wrong with that?
Re: David Coote
Posted by RADSB on 28/4/2024, 10:20:14, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
There may not be hate for 2020 or GS but there's plenty willing to believe the worst and add to it You only have to read on here and FB and listen on matchdays to understand that.
Back to the issue, what do you thing the new name coward "lack of scrutiny spotter" meant by this - "Regardless of the playing side why won’t anyone be honest about Powes Court, that is a fundamental to our future and I am incredulous why so few are challenging the narrative.
The “added extras” for Kenilworth Road are a dead giveaway.
Was safe standing really needed???"
Re: David Coote
Posted by Ok on 28/4/2024, 10:58:11, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
All the above are fair questions don’t you think?
The bobbers I get and makes sense.
The rest need an answer along with how he thinks he deserved a 1-2 million pay packet last year.
No agenda from me on a personal level. ( he has done a good job )
Re: David Coote
Posted by RADSB on 28/4/2024, 11:00:28, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
GS and others have said safe standing will pay for itself. More fans in and better atmos. No downsides are there?
Re: David Coote
Posted by Ok on 28/4/2024, 11:19:56, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Not from me.
Even if power takes 5 years you have to utilise what you have.
Re: David Coote
Posted by Officer Barbrady on 28/4/2024, 9:51:59, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Until something is announced the only assumptions for the lack of update and information is that GS knows that he has misled the fans on PC and squad investment. And that he opted to not spend in January because he believed we had enough, including the Giles giveaway.
When fans realise that the ground is still 3-4 years away many more will say that we should have risked a little bit more investment to stay up in a poor league against clubs having points deducted.
The longer GS doesn’t update on PC the more chance people will forget about this.
Taking us for fools doesn’t work.
Re: David Coote
Posted by crumpsall on 28/4/2024, 12:22:54, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Cuba, are you seriously saying GS has 'misled fans'?
That's one hell of an accusation. I trust you would be prepared to back it up without the cover of message board facelessness?
Re: David Coote
Posted by bbb on 28/4/2024, 15:28:52, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Mislead is strong and certainly not the case. Not being as open as we would like and a bit shit at communicating with the supporters over PC, definitely.
Re: David Coote
Posted by crumpsall on 28/4/2024, 16:39:37, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Agreed
FAO Crumpsall
Posted by Cuba on 28/4/2024, 16:17:19, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Firstly BBB summarises better than me, misled is probably unfair but facts remain that there is a void in communication.
Crumpsall, you and I had a very frank and open discussion in early November for the reasons you thought PC comms had gone quiet.
Six months on, do you really below the reason you gave is the case and is still acceptable?
Re: FAO Crumpsall
Posted by crumpsall on 28/4/2024, 16:44:39, in reply to "FAO Crumpsall"
Probably unfair? It's a downright lie and a very unpleasant accusation that is distinctly libelous.
And yes I stand by whatever I said then, not that I recall details - have never posted anything on the subject that's not been true or consistent.
If you bothered to engage with the club, or the Trust, instead of just posting poisonous and negative messages on here you might be a bit more clued up.
Re: FAO Crumpsall
Posted by Cuba on 28/4/2024, 17:32:44, in reply to "Re: FAO Crumpsall"
You said you suspected it was due to the death of ML and you expected the situation to be resolved and more comms to be forthcoming. Fair enough and fully understandable.
But we have got a year round since the last major ground announcement and since zip, other than a throw away like at the fans forum.
Since Talksport lost interest in us it’s gone even quieter.
The club line post promotion was that money was being set aside for the ground, and that would constrict played spend.
If that was so how about balancing up the poor form on the pitch in 2024 with good news about the ground.
And if we are in the business of spending money wisely why did we give Giles away free and leave two gaps for injured players in the squad?
Re: FAO Crumpsall
Posted by crumpsall on 28/4/2024, 18:23:56, in reply to "Re: FAO Crumpsall"
Did you actually engage your brain before writing that lot? I'm watching the City Forest game but if I can be bothered I'll go through it and respond later.
Your first paragraph is accurate, the rest a lot of nonsense. And lazily put together by the usual standards of your crap routine. The last paragraph particularly.
Re: David Coote
Posted by Morning Cuba on 28/4/2024, 11:48:00, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Different day
Different name
Same old, same old
Re: David Coote
Posted by Wingnut on 28/4/2024, 9:55:37, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Tbh you wear the fool moniker pretty well...perfect fit Id say...
Re: David Coote
Posted by Lack of scrutiny spotter on 28/4/2024, 8:29:02, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Nope, it’s not.
Admin can confirm if anyone is bothered.
Re: David Coote
Posted by RADSB on 28/4/2024, 8:42:33, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
Doppelganger then.
Re: David Coote
Posted by Bicester Hat on 28/4/2024, 7:35:43, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
It wasn’t the refs fault we lost but he was awful.
Re: David Coote
Posted by Hatterman on 28/4/2024, 8:32:41, in reply to "Re: David Coote"
No referee’s decision affected yesterday’s result !
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board
administration.
Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton
Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or
anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any
other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.
