This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

    Forest non penalties

    Posted by Ronnies Finger on 21/4/2024, 18:30:21

    Not interested in their tweet, but by Christ having watched the incidents, you can see their frustration.

    If that was us this site would be in meltdown..

      Re: Forest non penalties

      Posted by Benfleethatter on 21/4/2024, 22:50:34, in reply to "Forest non penalties "

      Quick view of this thread and the varying decisions from everyone just goes to show that there is absolutely no conspiracy. None of the 3 penalties were clear cut enough to have a solid agreement from the people commenting here, therefore the VAR were correct not to get involved and, in fact, Forest are a bunch of blubbering, whinging losers.

        Re: Forest non penalties

        Posted by sloopy on 21/4/2024, 22:37:09, in reply to "Forest non penalties "

        No we would be used to it

          Re: Forest non penalties

          Posted by Ches Fordroad on 21/4/2024, 21:35:53, in reply to "Forest non penalties "

          Fuck 'em.

          Can't for the life of me understand why people are going all Borino over this. They've been utter cunts towards us the past couple of years and people are siding with them?

          Fuck 'em.

            Re: Forest non penalties

            Posted by Herve Baquet on 21/4/2024, 21:00:15, in reply to "Forest non penalties "

            What they’re doing is making sure whoever refs them next has absolute pressure on them to give them a pen.

            It’s fucking scandalous. Throw the pricks out of the league.

              Re: Forest non penalties

              Posted by Sandgrounder on 21/4/2024, 21:28:37, in reply to "Re: Forest non penalties "

              I hope it has the exact opposite effect and referees won’t want to be seen to caving into this pressure and so the marginal calls go against them.

              I also hope that anyone who interacts with a Forest fan anywhere online or offline over the next few days draws their attention to the ‘ghost goal’ Atwell gave against Watford. Would be good to stoke their conspiracy theories further and send them even more apoplectic!

                Re: Forest non penalties

                Posted by Herve Baquet on 21/4/2024, 21:31:18, in reply to "Re: Forest non penalties "

                It’s insane isn’t it.

                Football has become such a basketcase sport.
                Fans have lost their minds

                Re: Forest non penalties

                Posted by Ramridge Raider on 21/4/2024, 21:16:11, in reply to "Re: Forest non penalties "

                It also the reason they bought in Clattenburg. Hoping his presence may sway the officials.

                Desperate stuff from a clearly desperate club.

                  Re: Forest non penalties

                  Posted by boz on 21/4/2024, 21:15:07, in reply to "Re: Forest non penalties "

                  actually i think you are spot on

                  trying to manipulate over and over again, because they broke the rules

                  fucking wankers

                  Re: Forest non penalties

                  Posted by m on 21/4/2024, 20:02:06, in reply to "Forest non penalties "

                  the handball one. 2_hours later one is given at Wembley for similar. Fans just want consistent decision making.

                    Re: Forest non penalties

                    Posted by Benfleethatter on 21/4/2024, 22:43:26, in reply to "Re: Forest non penalties "

                    Thing is, the one at Wembley was given onfield. As I've said before, some of these decisions are subjective. VAR shouldn't get involved in subjective decisions. The one at Wembley, in my view, was a mistake. Many others may disagree. Hence, subjective.

                    Re: Forest non penalties

                    Posted by Hatsworth on 21/4/2024, 19:31:33, in reply to "Forest non penalties "

                    I can see their frustration because there were 3 (4?) of them, but none of them were clear and obvious imo, and there was a lot of histrionics which doesn’t (shouldn't) help. I’d be annoyed right enough, but that’s what being a fan is about.

                    Given we still have to play them, as it happens an Everton win was not the best result for us I don’t think.

                      Re: Forest non penalties

                      Posted by Oh Well on 21/4/2024, 19:15:01, in reply to "Forest non penalties "

                      Karma.
                      Watching the cheats cry on social media about being cheated is funny.

                        Re: Forest non penalties

                        Posted by Brko's Bicycle on 21/4/2024, 18:55:47, in reply to "Forest non penalties "

                        All touch and go, for me. Unlucky not to get any of them, all decent shouts, but none absolutely nailed on. Arguably the 3rd more of a clear pen.

                          Re: Forest non penalties

                          Posted by Macca on 21/4/2024, 19:00:56, in reply to "Re: Forest non penalties "

                          1 and 2 no! But 3rd was 100 % Penalty

                          Re: Forest non penalties

                          Posted by Hugh Jaynus on 21/4/2024, 18:44:32, in reply to "Forest non penalties "

                          1st wasnt a pen for me, contact minimal. The 2nd was a penalty given current definition of handball rule but would have been soft. 3rd was a pen in my opinion but not stonewall.

                          No conspiracy here

                            Re: Forest non penalties

                            Posted by Hard man on 21/4/2024, 18:32:14, in reply to "Forest non penalties "

                            First two clear pens,didn't watch 2nd half

                              Re: Forest non penalties

                              Posted by Jimmy on 21/4/2024, 18:39:52, in reply to "Re: Forest non penalties "

                              Yes, clear penalties all three. How on earth were they not given?

                                Re: Forest non penalties

                                Posted by Hugh Jaynus on 21/4/2024, 18:45:08, in reply to "Re: Forest non penalties "

                                Because var is a luton fan, obviously

                                  Re: Forest non penalties

                                  Posted by Just an observation on 21/4/2024, 18:41:01, in reply to "Re: Forest non penalties "

                                  Ah, well. Shame. Never mind!!

                                    Re: Forest non penalties

                                    Posted by Maccacracker on 21/4/2024, 19:22:47, in reply to "Re: Forest non penalties "

                                    Just watched, and yes they have been grumbling about decisions going against them this season,but all 3 could have been given and numbers 2 and 3 were clear.
                                    Not sour grapes on this occasion.

                                      Re: Forest non penalties

                                      Posted by Benfleethatter on 21/4/2024, 19:32:24, in reply to "Re: Forest non penalties "

                                      The fact that some say they're stonewall and others say not a penalty, means they're surely subjective and not clear and obvious. I'd like to see VAR not get involved in that type of decision, but it'scrazy that VAR didnt refer any of them. The one's VAR gave in our match v Sheffield United
                                      were the most ludicrous decisions ever. Paul Tierney makes mistakes galore and yet carries on unpunished.
                                      Officiating is broken. VAR should only be used once it's fully automated. There's no consistency otherwise.

                            [ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

                            DISCLAIMER

                            The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

                            Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

                              Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

                              What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.

                            eXTReMe Tracker