This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other
content posted on it.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks.
If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a
ban.Enjoy.
Posted by Help on 21/9/2023, 17:50:51, in reply to "Google maps "
If jinc did thinking....
Re: Google maps
Posted by Woodston hat on 21/9/2023, 16:45:48, in reply to "Google maps "
Darwin awarrd.
One less twat in the world.
Re: Google maps
Posted by Buzzard on 21/9/2023, 13:10:19, in reply to "Google maps "
if any article sums up the modern world then that's the one.
Man is rapidly losing his ability to think for himself.
And then promptly blame someone else.
FFS
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 13:34:03, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
Your sat nav tells you the route to use and there are no warning signs or barriers preventing you from taking that route? How is this the fault of “not thinking for yourself” and what would you have done differently in that situation?
Re: Google maps
Posted by Buzzard on 21/9/2023, 14:09:51, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
what you would drive off the edge of a collapsed bridge, just because Google maps told you to?
Berk
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 14:16:37, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
How do you know he could see it was collapsed?
Re: Google maps
Posted by Oh dear on 21/9/2023, 14:43:40, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
Another day of you trying to start arguments over nothing on Outlaws I see.
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 15:09:19, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
“Another day” When was my last?
Re: Google maps
Posted by Madpig on 22/9/2023, 14:11:21, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
?feature=shared
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 14:21:56, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
And I don’t think anyone is suggesting google maps told him to drive off a collapsed bridge.
Re: Google maps
Posted by RADSB on 21/9/2023, 13:47:24, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
They are suing the wrong people. Whoever is responsible for the bridge should have warning signs up and erected a barrier. It's not sensible to rely on random people "telling" google the bridge is out - all sorts of mischied could be done if that approach was adopted
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 15:18:29, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
The lawsuit also names some private property management companies that are responsible for the land. But I guess that isn’t as clickbaity a headline for the story.
Re: Google maps
Posted by Bloke on 21/9/2023, 13:23:50, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
+1
Woke/Lefty/American mentality.
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 13:30:45, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
Wait, wanting those responsible for not putting barriers and signs up on a collapsed bridge to be held to account and thinking a Sat Nav should know about a bridge being collapsed for 5 years is “woke” now?
Re: Google maps
Posted by jimmyp on 21/9/2023, 17:36:40, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
Anything that can be put under the heading 'not being a total cunt' is 'woke' as far as that cretin's concerned.
Cheers, Jim
Re: Google maps
Posted by TPDC on 21/9/2023, 17:35:35, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
+1
Completely idiotic comment from Bloke.
Re: Google maps
Posted by HH on 21/9/2023, 13:19:09, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
+1
Looking to blame google because their relative was a more than a bit stupid.
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 13:34:39, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
In what way was he more than a bit stupid?
Re: Google maps
Posted by HH on 21/9/2023, 13:54:04, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
He drove over a collapsed bridge.
Re: Google maps
Posted by Doctor Ince on 21/9/2023, 16:01:55, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
Can only assume ADHDHAT is a bit bored
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 16:11:10, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
I’m sure to be now you’ve piped up.
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 14:19:55, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
You sure he knew it was collapsed? That he could see it?
Re: Google maps
Posted by HH on 21/9/2023, 14:37:52, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
Is it google's responsibility that he could see it was collapsed?
Surely the driver has some blame in all of this. As RADSB says, the real negligence lies mainly with the state. My Satnav always tries to get me to drive down one way streets the wrong way. I don't do it because of the signs.
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 15:12:00, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
Where did I say that? There’s a gaping chasm (pun intended) to suggesting it might not have been his fault and he wasn’t being stupid to saying it’s entirely Google’s responsibility.
Re: Google maps
Posted by Woodston hat on 21/9/2023, 19:15:56, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
If he didnt see it until it was too late, he was possibly speeding, its his fault, plus whoever maintains the road.
Re: Google maps
Posted by HH on 21/9/2023, 15:58:56, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
I just don't see google having any legal responsibility whatsoever to deduce whether the roads it's suggesting you drive on are in proper condition to be driven on. It's absolutely nothing to do with them.
The fault is between the state and the driver.
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 16:10:28, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
Fine. I disagree with that. But I was really questioning your reasoning that he was “more than a bit stupid”. Don’t think that necessarily fair and certainly reductive given the circumstances.
Re: Google maps
Posted by HH on 21/9/2023, 16:53:37, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
I respect that but equally I stand by it. Unless there is load more context to come out, on first impressions, to drive over a collapsed bridge means you're certainly not driving with the care and attention.
I can't imagine many circumstances, unless it's particularly lashing down with rain, thick fog etc, where I would proceed over a bridge without realising it's collapsed. Even at night, he would have headlights on.
Anyway, agree to disagree
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 17:44:00, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
It was a dark night with heavy rainy. Unfamiliar road, no warning signs and his sat nav didn’t suggest the road was impassible. Tragic accident but not because he was “stupid”. Check the image of the bridge in the article. I can see how it could happen.
Re: Google maps
Posted by Buzzard on 21/9/2023, 14:27:29, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
anyone else gone off it? Or just him
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 15:13:01, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
Don’t know. Do you?
Re: Google maps
Posted by Buzzard on 21/9/2023, 15:28:13, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
I haven't a clue but I assume they didn't find a big pile of cars or I suspect that would have been included in the article.
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 15:40:48, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
You’re just being silly now.
Re: Google maps
Posted by Buzzard on 21/9/2023, 15:43:55, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
Logical?
Re: Google maps
Posted by ADHDHAT on 21/9/2023, 15:49:47, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
It’s logical to think that every previous incident has lead to a car going off the bridge entirely and then being left there so they pile up? No. It’s a bit silly.
Re: Google maps
Posted by J in C on 21/9/2023, 13:16:14, in reply to "Re: Google maps "
I used to drive round Northern Europe and its cities- always managed with my maps -The signposts are top notch on the M ways . always found the destination
Re: Google maps
Posted by HH on 21/9/2023, 13:08:47, in reply to "Google maps "
I remember about 15 years ago Google Maps used to tell people to jet ski between Japan and China.
Not sure they're entirely responsible because someone attempted to drive over a collapsed bridge.
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board
administration.
Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton
Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or
anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any
other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.
