This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

    1898 not 1881

    Posted by RADSB on 27/3/2023, 9:27:52

    Just a reminder of their 1881 nonsense for those who are in contact with them down the road.

    http://thestrawplaiters.com/library/watford-f-c-formed-in-1881-1891-or-1898/

      Re: 1898 not 1881

      Posted by sloopy on 27/3/2023, 11:49:47, in reply to "1898 not 1881"

      They probably chose a committee in 1881 and appointed a manager to run it. They sacked that manager after 2 months, and continued in the same vane every 2 or 3 months until somebody realised that it was pointless, and eventually found that it was 1898 before they could get round to it. They shouldn't have bothered.

        Re: 1898 not 1881

        Posted by Ronnies Finger on 27/3/2023, 10:41:20, in reply to "1898 not 1881"

        Who gives a Shit, we have enough over them for this detail to get in a lather about..,

          Re: 1898 not 1881

          Posted by RADSB on 27/3/2023, 11:00:41, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

          If you read my post you will see its aimed at those who are in contact with them - no lather, just some ammo.

            Re: 1898 not 1881

            Posted by HH on 27/3/2023, 10:50:51, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

            As I said below, I do.

            If we were to play by their rules we could claim we were formed in 1879*.

            If they play by our rules, they were formed in 1898.

            It's just another example of them being absolute fucking charlatans.

            *I'm sure RADSB will correct me if that is wrong!

            Re: 1898 not 1881

            Posted by Sam on 27/3/2023, 10:03:18, in reply to "1898 not 1881"

            So what are you going to do about it?

              Re: 1898 not 1881

              Posted by You what mate? on 27/3/2023, 10:06:08, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

              You seem very angry. Are you OK? Is there someone we can call for you?

                Re: 1898 not 1881

                Posted by Sam on 27/3/2023, 10:07:55, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                I’m so angry that they’ve changed their formation date. Going to lose hours of sleep over this

                Re: 1898 not 1881

                Posted by RADSB on 27/3/2023, 10:04:22, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                I've done it, can't you read?

                  Re: 1898 not 1881

                  Posted by K.l. on 27/3/2023, 10:06:24, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                  No he cant. He's a vegetable.

                    Re: 1898 not 1881

                    Posted by RADSB on 27/3/2023, 10:08:07, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                    I've rattled their cage. Wonderful responses from complete turds.

                      Re: 1898 not 1881

                      Posted by Sam on 27/3/2023, 10:10:25, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                      Well done, was it worth 2 years of your life though

                        Re: 1898 not 1881

                        Posted by Hat66 on 27/3/2023, 11:55:39, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                        Is that what the judge said when you were sentenced?

                          Re: 1898 not 1881

                          Posted by RADSB on 27/3/2023, 10:12:55, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                          It was worth it to read their responses to my research and expose their lies. They don't like me. I'm not sure why you're spending so much time posting and getting upset about it.

                            Re: 1898 not 1881

                            Posted by HH on 27/3/2023, 10:12:29, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                            Are you a Watford fan trawling a Luton forum or a Luton fan defending Watford?

                            Tragic either way.

                              Re: 1898 not 1881

                              Posted by Truth is on 27/3/2023, 10:44:34, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                              'Sam' is one of the multi name trolls that unfortunately frequent this board.
                              He has no life, no wife and no friends. He is on medication for his severe acne which stops him from leaving his bedsit due to embarrassment
                              Rumour has it he once put 7 Cadburys Creme Eggs up his arse. Just because he could.

                        Re: 1898 not 1881

                        Posted by Sam on 27/3/2023, 10:06:23, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                        Ok right, bet you they’re rush to get everything changed now.Well done

                          Re: 1898 not 1881

                          Posted by Nearly a Genius on 27/3/2023, 10:31:27, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                          "they're"?
                          Ignorant pillock.

                            Re: 1898 not 1881

                            Posted by RADSB on 27/3/2023, 10:07:25, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                            Hah, you clearly know nothing and are on here to disgree with everything.

                              Re: 1898 not 1881

                              Posted by crumpsall on 27/3/2023, 10:17:50, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                              It's one of the regular trolls who knows #### all about anything and understands even less.

                              He's 'fishing' - what a tragic waste of time and life, to get a thrill from 'bites'.

                              One of the most pathetic aspects of social media trolls.

                                Re: 1898 not 1881

                                Posted by RADSB on 27/3/2023, 10:24:26, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                                There's certainly a serious personality disorder in there.

                        Re: 1898 not 1881

                        Posted by 2023 not 1900 on 27/3/2023, 9:48:20, in reply to "1898 not 1881"

                        God's sake, who cares ?

                          Re: 1898 not 1881

                          Posted by HH on 27/3/2023, 10:07:53, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                          I do. I find it strange a club just bullshits about its origins.

                          And I applaud RADSB's research.

                            Re: 1898 not 1881

                            Posted by RADSB on 27/3/2023, 10:08:47, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                            Strangely they haven't thanked me for my research.

                            Re: 1898 not 1881

                            Posted by Dave Hedgehog on 27/3/2023, 9:56:17, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                            If this board only had things that everyone cared about posted on it then it would be completely empty.

                              Re: 1898 not 1881

                              Posted by RADSB on 27/3/2023, 9:53:25, in reply to "Re: 1898 not 1881"

                              You think I care what you think! Deluded.

                          [ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

                          DISCLAIMER

                          The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

                          Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

                            Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

                            What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.

                          eXTReMe Tracker