Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil

220,000

Posted by Number Cruncher on 1/2/2023, 22:36:54

The amount of Pounds Sterling from the public purse to defend Boris over Partygate?

The stench just gets worse….

Re: 220,000

Posted by All MP's are ####s. on 2/2/2023, 0:17:35, in reply to "220,000"

End of.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Tory Boy on 1/2/2023, 22:51:17, in reply to "220,000"

That's nothing compared to the money Blair cost the country with his war.

Re: 220,000

Posted by E1 on 2/2/2023, 8:14:35, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Which your Tory heroes supported.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Number Cruncher on 1/2/2023, 22:58:14, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Nice bit of whataboutery there mate. Got any other deflections?

Re: 220,000

Posted by Thick tory spotter on 1/2/2023, 22:58:13, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Iraq = 8 billion
Thick Liz = 30 billion
HS2 = 100 billion
Gumbo = Untold billions to the boys ( still ongoing )

Re: 220,000

Posted by Cheated on 2/2/2023, 10:17:30, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Blair and labour, millions of innocent people dead

Re: 220,000

Posted by Caught Jester on 2/2/2023, 12:55:10, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

6 public enquires, no evidence of any wrongdoing found Adolf.

Not that you actually GIVE a fûck that so many lost their lives of course.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Fact Check on 2/2/2023, 12:23:11, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Not defending Blair or a single innocent death but your figures are wildly inaccurate:

No one knows with certainty how many people have been killed and wounded in Iraq since the 2003 United States invasion. However, we know that between 275,000 and 306,000 civilians have died from direct war related violence caused by the U.S., its allies, the Iraqi military and police, and opposition forces from the time of the invasion through October 2019. The violent deaths of Iraqi civilians have occurred through aerial bombing, shelling, gunshots, suicide attacks, and fires started by bombing. Many civilians have also been injured.

Because not all war-related deaths have been recorded accurately by the Iraqi government and the U.S.-led coalition, the numbers are likely much higher. Several estimates based on randomly selected household surveys place the total death count among Iraqis in the hundreds of thousands.

(from the Watson Institute, Brown University, Cost of War report)

Re: 220,000

Posted by I spot on 2/2/2023, 9:57:05, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

442 the sad act.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Pity you could not on 2/2/2023, 12:15:24, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Spot who is posting the truth and who was lying.

That’s proper sad and telling.

*just a note*
442 has not posted on here for years,having an obsession with him is a bit ….. erm freaky at best.

If he made you look a twat that’s not his problem,you worked hard to earn the plaudits.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Hahaha!!! on 2/2/2023, 12:31:31, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Yeah, of course he hasn't 🤣🤣🤣

Re: 220,000

Posted by crumpsall on 2/2/2023, 12:32:05, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

He hasn't.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Hahaha!!! on 2/2/2023, 12:45:18, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Okie dokie

🤣🤣🤣

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 1/2/2023, 23:19:26, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Have a bother go at the Liz numbers treacle….and you have the cheek to call people thick….😂😂

Re: 220,000

Posted by Have you got another on 1/2/2023, 23:26:18, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Secret Bloomberg report?

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 1/2/2023, 23:29:08, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Explain the £30m brains…. I was going to go to bed but will wait for this pearl of wisdom….

Re: 220,000

Posted by You still here on 1/2/2023, 23:40:44, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

???????????

It's getting late.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Nearly a Genius on 1/2/2023, 23:36:47, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

https://www.rms-recruitment.co.uk/2022/11/revealed-the-30bn-cost-of-liz-trusss-disastrous-mini-budget/

https://metro.co.uk/2022/11/14/jeremy-hunt-blames-liz-truss-as-he-warns-of-tax-and-energy-price-rises-17751876/

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 1/2/2023, 23:49:15, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

And you call Boris lazy….if you want to make an opinion write one instead of picking articles you like and copy and pasting them .

Re: 220,000

Posted by Nearly a Genius on 2/2/2023, 9:52:34, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

You ask for proof. I supply links to reputable sources which provide that proof.
What don't you understand about that?

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 9:59:39, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

I understand you are lazy …😂😂

Re: 220,000

Posted by Nearly a Genius on 2/2/2023, 10:06:58, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

You're unbelievable!
You claim to have knowledge of financial matters, but never provide any verifiable facts.
Anyway, I can't waste any more time on trying to get a thick bigot to understand reality.

Try getting your head out of the sand and into the real world.

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 10:11:02, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Try reading what I have written below to HH which is a factual reflection on the chain of events not a cut and paste snapshot of the now .
You claim to be NAG so read , digest and form an opinion rather than “ oh it’s Tory it must be shit” .
Let me know what you disagree with that post and we can have a grown up debate.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Nearly a Genius on 2/2/2023, 16:47:51, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Oh dear.
I don't "claim" to be anything.

Now, are you saying that all the news organisations, including those which normally have their agenda set by this clueless mob, are not reporting the truth, but making stuff up?
The fact is that Thick Lizzy and her Chancellor, with their ridiculous ideas about the economy, started a process which meant that the country was £30,000,000 short.

Get your head out of your heroes' collective backsides and get into the real world.

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 17:14:09, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Just admit you don’t understand what happened..it’s ok .
What’s £30,000,000 got to do with anything ?

Re: 220,000

Posted by Nearly a Genius on 2/2/2023, 17:21:36, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

That is the amount of money Thick Lizzy cost the country, as everyone but you admits.
It's you who don't understand.

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 3/2/2023, 0:00:39, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Sigh …. You need to change the nearly to nowhere near ….Explain to me how she lost the country £30b ? Don’t cut and paste some article written during the debacle write in your own words how between then and now we lost that money ?

Re: 220,000

Posted by Rotten Government Spotter on 3/2/2023, 1:45:48, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Don’t cut and paste some article written during the debacle

Zed, that’s just how I like my irony

Re: 220,000

Posted by Mahatma Gander on 2/2/2023, 8:59:27, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

What's your opinion on what it cost seeing as you apparently understand it better than anyone I have ever read on the subject?

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 9:15:21, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

See below.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Mahatma Gander on 2/2/2023, 9:16:41, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Sorry, where below do you give a figure for the cost?

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 9:50:35, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Plus £3.8 billion.

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 2/2/2023, 9:59:54, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Again, are you fucking high?

Are you genuinely arguing that the economy is a net £3.8b better off as a result of their mad half hour?

Genuinely, this is fucking mental.

Cheers, Jim

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 10:03:55, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Feel free to disagree with what I have written above and explain what is incorrect ?

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 2/2/2023, 10:06:21, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Is that a 'yes'? You're genuinely arguing that the economy is a net £3.8b better off.

Cheers, Jim

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 10:12:41, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Well the BOE are so by default we are …put feel free to explain otherwise ?

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 2/2/2023, 11:00:03, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

For that single factor. You seem to be ignoring everything else going on with the economy.

Cheers, Jim

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 11:30:12, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Not at all . We are talking about a particular event what I have written is objective, you are being subjective and have no substance to back up your claims.

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 2/2/2023, 11:49:50, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Your assertion is that the economy is a net £3.8b better off. Which is complete and utter mental bollocks.

Since you seem to believe that just because they were fucked off and all their stupid shit reversed* that no harm was done there is absolutely no point in anyone sensible trying to argue it with you.

Cheers, Jim

* the clue is in the fact that The BoE HAD to step in to prevent the economy from completely tanking, that the disaster twins HAD to be fucked off and that their stupid shit HAD to be reversed. It's not really a fucking surprise if, from a point of precipice-edge market-panic, the government bonds have increased in value now that all the stupid shit isn't going to be happening and our economy is not going to be mortally fucked. It's the absolute bare, fucking, minimum and indeed the point of fucking doing it in the first place. By all means pretend that damage wasn't done and this is the only result of the whole sorry episode but it's stupid and wildly inaccurate.

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 14:17:21, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

If you are bought a car for £19300 and sold it for £23,100 a couple of months later ( didn’t spend any money on it)would you have made a profit?
Yes/No

So stick to the question and try not to go on one of your irrelevant rambles.
I understand what happened ….you don’t need to write it down again and again . I am telling you what the result was .

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 2/2/2023, 15:17:24, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

If I bought a car for £19,300 and bought some new wheels for £193 got them refurbished and then they were worth £231 but in the meantime the engine had seized and all the bodywork rusted, would I be happy with the £38 I'd made on the wheels?

The entire rest of the economy is not irrelevant bollocks, you complete mentalist.

Cheers, Jim

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 16:33:41, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

If only the BOE could bet on you not answering a question… all our woes would disappear.
Maybe you can show some evidence of the wheels refurbishment and I don’t mean hearsay or opinion…hard facts.

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 2/2/2023, 17:08:55, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

What in the blue fuck are you shitting on about, now?

It was your shit analogy, I was merely attempting to illustrate that one, small, improvement to one component does not improve the whole thing if the rest has been fucked.

I'm genuinely astonished that you can't see this, although I suspect that I really shouldn't be.

Cheers, Jim

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 17:17:45, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Yep lots of noise and words but no facts.
I showed you how we benefited from the cluster #### in numbers . You go all shouty and sweary and produce not a single fact .
Go on give it a go , show us you have something to back up your statement…..
I am not astonished you can’t come up with anything .

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 2/2/2023, 17:35:03, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

You showed one benefit which, again, was not to be unexpected.

The entire rest of the economy, rising interest rates, failing, to control rampant inflation just for two examples, is fucked. £3.8b does not make up for that. Keep deflecting and obfuscating if you like but it's a very simple point. The fact that you don't get it is probably quite indicative of your level of understanding of any of it. Or anything. Ever.

Cheers, Jim

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 3/2/2023, 0:06:52, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

My level of understanding…..#### that’s rich. I have explained several times that rising interest rates are nothing to do with what she did and rising interest rates are being used to control GLOBAL inflation .
You just keep spouting the same shit with lots of words and zero substance. I thought you were one of the more intelligent ones on this board but you seem to struggle with basic maths and economics.

Re: 220,000

Posted by If you on 3/2/2023, 18:08:58, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

genuinely think a 3bn profit on bonds means there is no impact from Liz then not only do you NOT understand economics you're also incredibly thick.

Re: 220,000

Posted by To be fair on 2/2/2023, 18:05:11, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

If Burke scores on Saturday but then concedes 30 own goals, he still scored a goal.

Genuine giggles here. ( if that's what he is trying to post. )

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 3/2/2023, 0:09:12, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

No you multi named prat if Burke scores 6 goals and concedes 2 would be the example….arithmetic for dummies….give it a go.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Rotten Government Spotter on 3/2/2023, 1:52:53, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Pissed again I see

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 2/2/2023, 19:02:28, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

The only thing that I could equate it to is if he scores a goal but scores 30 OGs then, for some reason, we completely ignore the latter and claim an aggregate score of 1-0 on the basis of the former.

It's completely, fucking, mental.

Cheers, Jim

Re: 220,000

Posted by Hey on 2/2/2023, 14:57:15, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Thick liz is trying for a comeback.

A vacancy awaits you as chancellor.

Especially the way you still have not addressed my points on gov borrowing and interest payments increase.

What’s the new slogan?

‘Liz swiz is gonna bring fizz’ it’s the best I’ve got.

Re: 220,000

Posted by HH on 2/2/2023, 14:56:00, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

This is wild.

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 2/2/2023, 15:21:54, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

It's fucking mental, innit.

Cheers, Jim

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 10:05:03, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Actually the response to HH …tell me what is incorrect ?

Re: 220,000

Posted by Here you go Thickie on 1/2/2023, 23:36:32, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

RFs economist.

20 billion on unfounded NI cuts and stamp duty.
10 billion on higher interest rates + gov borrowing.

Economy collapse showing lower growth = lower tax receipts.

Now go to be Mungo unless you have anything to note.

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 1/2/2023, 23:47:46, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

1- Tax cuts didn’t happen so total bollox.
2- Interest rates are going up at a higher rate in the US and also increasing in Europe ….#### all to do with what Truss did it’s about inflation.
3- The Treasury stock purchased by the BOE was sold after a couple of months and made £3.8 billion PROFIT.

So you are writing bollox but when you are so bigoted guess it’s impossible to actually see the wood through the trees.

Just to be clear what happened with treasury’s was more luck than judgement and had she remained in power following the same path then imo it would have caused damage.We will never know.

Re: 220,000

Posted by HH on 2/2/2023, 9:02:34, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

I sort of agree the £30bn is a bit mythical and can be partly undone if the treasury changed its rules back to what they were last year.

But, Truss clearly made inflation worse. The lending markets lost faith in her and interest rates rose as a result - that's inflationary.

Additionally, the pound crashed against the dollar. That makes things more expensive and is inflationary.

She was a disaster. Things are worse than they would have been because of her, but they still would have been pretty bad had she not been in power.

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 9:49:23, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Always happy to discuss with you HH , don’t agree on much but at least you approach with an open mind unlike the multi named coward posting last night.
So to clarify what happened when Truss & Kwarteng came to power and announced tax cuts etc markets reacted badly and many investors started to sell off Treasury stock.Not a great endorsement for UK Plc. The BOE stepped in and said they would buy up to £60b which had the effect of calming markets.
They actually purchased 19.3 billion and then sold them for a profit of £3.8b.I am not suggesting for one second that was planned and very unlikely it would have worked out like that should she have stayed in power. Fortunate but we did ok from it.
Inflation has been building for over two years , the few weeks she was in power is irrelevant. If you can show me one BOE member who has suggested that what happened then has had lasting impact on inflation I would be very surprised .
The dollar falling doesn’t necessarily add to inflation but the move was pretty irrelevant as it means things we import from the US become more expensive and things we export become cheaper.We export more so arguably a weaker pound is beneficial.
However to put the “crashing pound” into perspective it was 1.12 on the 23rd Sept and fell 4% to 1.07 . It was back to 1.14 12 days later…. It’s 1.235 today does that mean Sunak is a genius …no it means that US rates are slowing and the dollar s weakening on the back of that .
Last sentence no argument but we actually came out ok from it…as mentioned imo more luck than judgement .
Have a good day.

Re: 220,000

Posted by HH on 2/2/2023, 10:15:47, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

TBH, I couldn't disagree more.

Far from coming out ok from it we've a worse outlook in terms of growth, debt and inflation then we did before hand.

Andrew Bailey, a the head of the BoE, said the other week there is a hangover from Truss' minibudget.

£3bn months after she left office and the situation was stabilised is nothing in terms of what was lost when growth was downgraded and the pound crashed.

She's not the sole cause at all, far from it but she made it much worse then it need be.

Also, this statement:

The dollar (pound I presume you mean?) falling doesn’t necessarily add to inflation but the move was pretty irrelevant as it means things we import from the US become more expensive and things we export become cheaper

We literally have a record trade deficit with the US at the moment. That, and the fact oil is traded in dollars - any crash in the pound against it has a profound inflationary impact.

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 11:24:44, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

When yous at the other week ? He made comments about the mini budget at the time which were relevant, however as I tried to explain things turned out way better as a) they reversed all the decisions and b) she ####ed off.
Just as aside the BOE committee are understandably feeling a bit defensive atm as most economists believe they should have started to tighten earlier. Tbf other central banks are receiving the same criticism .
You keep banging on about the pound crashing it was higher than before the mini budget several days later…and is now way higher.Do you really think that will make any difference to how much we spend on oil….if so are you congratulating Sunak as it’s been 1.24 …no because it has very little to do with policy makers.

You could be right re balance of payments as I can only find historical official figures which I have posted below but they point in the opposite direction to what you are suggesting.What have you seen?

Total trade in goods and services (exports plus imports) between the UK and United States was £262.7 billion, in current prices, in the four quarters to the end of Q3 2022, an increase of 21.9% or £47.1 billion from the four quarters to the end of Q3 2021. Of this £262.7 billion:
• Total UK exports to United States amounted to £161.5 billion, in current prices, in the four quarters to the end of Q3 2022 (an increase of 20.6% or £27.6 billion compared to the four quarters to the end of Q3 2021);
• Total UK imports from United States amounted to £101.2 billion, in current prices, in the four quarters to the end of Q3 2022 (an increase of 23.9% or £19.5 billion compared to the four quarters to the end of Q3 2021).

Re: 220,000

Posted by HH on 2/2/2023, 13:37:22, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

In answer to your other question, I was referring just to goods rather than services.

Re: 220,000

Posted by HH on 2/2/2023, 12:29:57, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Yes, it rebounded because she u-turned on the 45p cut rate! Basically, it recovered when she announced she wasn't going to do what she said she would do!

And yes, considering we buy oil in dollars any fluctuation in the price of the £ against the $ has an impact upon how much we pay for oil and the knockout impact that has for other goods.

Honestly, Truss made things worse than they need be. You're pretending a £3bn profit at the BoE out does the impact shows you're not really seeing the bigger picture.

As I've said, a lot of the underlying fundamentals behind the current predicament are here anyway but we didn't need her pouring gas on the fire.

Re: 220,000

Posted by crumpsall on 2/2/2023, 11:29:43, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Those figures at the end....surely affected by covid/lockdown making the comparison between years difficult/unrealistic, surely?

Growth from a lowest point will always be big. Just been struggling with how to honestly represent that in another sector (events).

Naked stats haven't reflected the true situation at all over the last couple of years.

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 14:28:02, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Quite likely . I don’t have time to check but I think typically we are a net exporter to the US and have been for sometime so a weaker pound against the dollar helps.
Just to be clear that’s not what they were trying to achieve but it was such a short blip it made little difference.

Re: 220,000

Posted by No, no, no on 2/2/2023, 9:10:12, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

The Questioner is the ONLY one who understands the economy and finance as you can clearly see when he posts links that are hidden behind paywalls. And refuses to actually give any details himself.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Rotten Government Spotter on 2/2/2023, 10:57:01, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

He can’t remember where he lives, sometimes he works for the NHS, sometimes in finance - I often wonder if Zed knows what day of the week it is

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 11:27:25, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Your weird and a bit dumb.
Show me where I have ever mentioned I worked in the NHS and I will donate a £1k to the Labour Party . Assume if you can’t you will do the same to the Tory party.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Rotten Government Spotter on 2/2/2023, 11:46:38, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Oh you did Zed, unfortunately it won’t be on here but you definitely did.

Now, you crack on defending the Tories at every turn. I, like many others - find you making a bellend of yourself on a daily basis highly amusing.

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 2/2/2023, 14:25:02, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Course I did mate…that’s the sort of thing I would do .
See you have dropped my living arrangements now x finally worked it out….well done ✔️

Re: 220,000

Posted by Rotten Government Spotter on 2/2/2023, 21:18:07, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Course I did mate…that’s the sort of thing I would do .

Right. We got there in the end. Good fûcking grief

Re: 220,000

Posted by So on 1/2/2023, 23:55:25, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

You seem to have ignore a few things on my list.

Have another go without going on some weird website.

I will give you 5 min as I'm not a good sleeper when giggling.

You have no idea what that idiot cost the economy as its all guesswork anyway. Next time try not to a smart arse.

At least you Tories cheer me up.

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 1/2/2023, 23:57:43, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Brilliant ….I show you up from writing total bollox and then you ask me about the other points on your list .
Finest Whataboutery……sleep tight ….keep the window shut in case those nasty Tories get you.💕

Re: 220,000

Posted by So on 1/2/2023, 23:58:59, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Pop back tomorrow.

Night.

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 1/2/2023, 23:33:58, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Billion and I thought their mad half hour put an instant 60 billion hole in our economy.

Feel free to tell us the truth, though, eh.

Cheers, Jim

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 1/2/2023, 23:35:50, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Sorry my bad he wrote billion.
Give him a chance to explain himself .

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 1/2/2023, 23:42:48, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Are you, in any way, going to argue that Thick Lizzy and kamikaze's mad half hour wasn't an unmitigated disaster.

Cheers, Jim

Re: 220,000

Posted by Hell knows on 1/2/2023, 23:44:45, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

What weird right wing websites he is going through.

I thought he was ready.

Re: 220,000

Posted by The Questioner on 1/2/2023, 23:54:58, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

I don’t need to read any right wing websites, I understand economics and financial markets …sadly I suspect you don’t.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Hell knows on 1/2/2023, 23:57:33, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

you understand bootlicking for sure.

At least you are a giggle.

It’s

Posted by called a on 2/2/2023, 0:06:31, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

‘ZIMATOHA’

‘Zed is making a tit of himself again’

Re: 220,000

Posted by Come on on 1/2/2023, 23:37:37, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

We are all waiting for a laugh.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Thick Labourite Spotter on 1/2/2023, 23:07:20, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

HS2 has always had cross party support

Re: 220,000

Posted by Thick as you can be on 1/2/2023, 23:08:46, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

So did the Iraq war idiot.

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 1/2/2023, 23:19:37, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Fucking BOOM

Cheers, Jim

Re: 220,000

Posted by pingu on 1/2/2023, 23:20:51, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

chuckles in sg.

Re: 220,000

Posted by jimmyp on 1/2/2023, 23:31:40, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

What REALLY tickles me is this charming idea that after UK involvement in Iraq for basically its entire history, decades of supplying arms, training, intelligence, raw materials, you name it, we need weapons inspectors to tell us their military capabilities.

If Sainsbury's say there's a bag of rocket in my fridge it's because they know how it got there.

Cheers, Jim

Re: 220,000

Posted by clarky on 1/2/2023, 22:55:49, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Also sent British men to their death on a lie

Re: 220,000

Posted by So did Cameron on 1/2/2023, 23:03:06, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Libya squeaky clean and all true was it?

Re: 220,000

Posted by clarky on 1/2/2023, 23:08:26, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Cameron aswell not disputing that,just saying that Blair done it and the little creep is still telling people what to do

Re: 220,000

Posted by Nearly a Genius on 1/2/2023, 23:33:10, in reply to "Re: 220,000"

Eh?
The Iraq War was supported by the Conservatives and the Lib Dems.

And it has nothing to do with Johnson using public money to defend himself.

Re: 220,000

Posted by Wishi Washi on 1/2/2023, 22:41:11, in reply to "220,000"

Yer but what about those terrorist strikers.

« Back to index

[ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

Luton Outlaws - Independent Message Board for Luton Town FC