This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other
content posted on it.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks.
If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a
ban.Enjoy.
CMG
Posted by Pilkinhio on 26/1/2023, 23:39:41
No sign of recalling him. I was excited about his signing but we haven’t given him much of a chance. If Cornick goes maybe bring him back?
Re: Harry
Posted by Prober on 27/1/2023, 2:00:19, in reply to "CMG"
Why not offer Harry a new contract ? I think he's still good for us and if somebody wants to buy him ,let them make a proper offer in summer. Still recall brilliant game he had against Blackburn that kept us up. Superb club man worth backing.
Re: Harry
Posted by Yeah on 27/1/2023, 9:21:31, in reply to "Re: Harry"
He will probably treble his wages there, what would you do?
Re: Harry
Posted by Northeasthatter on 27/1/2023, 10:05:09, in reply to "Re: Harry"
Sell Harry now and get another 750k as he is out of contract. Bristol City just sold semenyo for 9 million to bournemouth
Re: Harry
Posted by Brad Garlinghouse on 27/1/2023, 8:37:27, in reply to "Re: Harry"
Totally agree, Harry is class.
Re: Harry
Posted by Stevio on 27/1/2023, 9:08:38, in reply to "Re: Harry"
+1
Re: Harry
Posted by Nearly a Genius on 27/1/2023, 9:40:42, in reply to "Re: Harry"
+ 2
Re: Harry
Posted by Buzzard on 27/1/2023, 9:10:46, in reply to "Re: Harry"
Part of the rise.
One of us.
Re: Harry
Posted by bbb on 27/1/2023, 9:27:03, in reply to "Re: Harry"
Yeah but he's got REALLY shit hair.
Re: Harry
Posted by Buzzard on 27/1/2023, 9:30:19, in reply to "Re: Harry"
not sure I can really talk on that front....
Re: Harry
Posted by bbb on 27/1/2023, 9:50:39, in reply to "Re: Harry"
+1 mate 🙈🤣
Re: Harry
Posted by Godders on 27/1/2023, 8:14:26, in reply to "Re: Harry"
Knowing 2020 they almost certainly have already offered him a new contract. But , as others have said, at his age, probably keeping his options open.
Re: Harry
Posted by Ches Fordroad on 27/1/2023, 9:14:33, in reply to "Re: Harry"
Don't you read Facebook? When these players leave because they're going to be out of contract it's always 2020's fault that they haven't re-signed.
Re: Harry
Posted by Godders on 27/1/2023, 10:29:25, in reply to "Re: Harry"
Re: Harry
Posted by Ramridge Raider on 27/1/2023, 6:28:04, in reply to "Re: Harry"
I'm torn on Cornick. Been great for us, if a bit inconsistent. However, with all of our forwards fit he is only going to be a bench player, albeit a great option to bring on with 20 minutes to go.
He's of the age now that he probably won't improve that much, so we msy well have seen the best of him.
Not sure we can afford to offer new deals to players that in all probability, will only warm the bench.
Re: Harry
Posted by Hatter 1 on 27/1/2023, 6:56:02, in reply to "Re: Harry"
Aren’t you only as good as the players who have on the bench? You need a squad a of good players not just a first eleven!
But I agree on Corns as a player, he’s not gonna get much better now, and for it’s whether we need to try and improve on him ..
Re: Harry
Posted by jimmyp on 27/1/2023, 10:53:59, in reply to "Re: Harry"
You're only as good as the players on the pitch.
However, if you played the players on the bench and out on loan, instead, you'd be better.
Cheers, Jim
Re: Harry
Posted by Mahatma Gander on 27/1/2023, 9:12:07, in reply to "Re: Harry"
Last year he scored 11 in 36 games for us plus the assists he made. I don't think he needs to get much better to be more than worth his place.
Re: Harry
Posted by Toddingtonsteve on 27/1/2023, 9:35:48, in reply to "Re: Harry"
Agreed. His performance at Wigan was his best for some time, to have someone that good on the bench is a great asset
Re: Harry
Posted by Ramridge Raider on 27/1/2023, 7:08:20, in reply to "Re: Harry"
The change in the sub rules certainly makes the bench more important these days.
I just don't know if we should offer a contract to a player, who is not often going to figure in the starting eleven.
I would also imagine Harry wants a regular starting position. At 27, he must be considering his options elsewhere.
Re: Harry
Posted by Mr T on 27/1/2023, 12:43:15, in reply to "Re: Harry"
I think you meant that an improved contract
Re: Harry
Posted by Seriously on 27/1/2023, 9:18:01, in reply to "Re: Harry"
Give your head a wobble and rethink that view.
Re: Harry
Posted by Just saying on 27/1/2023, 8:31:24, in reply to "Re: Harry"
So we should only offer contracts to players that are going to be in the starting 11?
Re: Harry
Posted by Bizarre Comment Spotter on 27/1/2023, 9:05:39, in reply to "Re: Harry"
????
Re: Harry
Posted by Stimm on 27/1/2023, 7:53:01, in reply to "Re: Harry"
Might want to see his options, possibly last chance to get a financial boost.
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board
administration.
Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton
Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or
anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any
other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.
