This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

    Nathan Jones

    Posted by I say it as it is on 5/10/2022, 8:23:17

    There is only one thing to blame for last night's embarrassing result and that is our managers inability to sign a defender when Naismith left.

      Re: Nathan Jones

      Posted by Notorious D on 5/10/2022, 10:57:43, in reply to "Nathan Jones "

      Trolling hell. Hoping to catch another NJ nibble with that one, aren’t you 🙈!

        Re: Nathan Jones

        Posted by Stevio on 5/10/2022, 10:34:37, in reply to "Nathan Jones "

        You clueless gobshite

          Re: Nathan Jones

          Posted by RGDave on 5/10/2022, 12:33:20, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

          That's being a little generous to him.

          Re: Nathan Jones

          Posted by RM on 5/10/2022, 10:13:43, in reply to "Nathan Jones "

          How did we not lose the other 9 league games out of the 12 we have played not having Naismith or his replacement in the team?

            Re: Nathan Jones

            Posted by Bogo on 5/10/2022, 9:33:13, in reply to "Nathan Jones "

            Is that all you got? Why don't you name the defender that luton should have signed? Got a list have you?

              Re: Nathan Jones

              Posted by I say it as it is on 5/10/2022, 10:04:16, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

              That's the managers job.

                Re: Nathan Jones

                Posted by Mahatma Gander on 5/10/2022, 11:26:43, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                Yes, and there's a bloody good set of reasons why he has the job and an even better set concerning why you haven't.

                  Re: Nathan Jones

                  Posted by Recruitment Team on 5/10/2022, 10:41:13, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                  Why are we here, then?

                Re: Nathan Jones

                Posted by Woburn Hattter on 5/10/2022, 9:07:45, in reply to "Nathan Jones "

                Plastic posts are the best

                  Re: Nathan Jones

                  Posted by Jokers. on 5/10/2022, 8:36:21, in reply to "Nathan Jones "

                  Naismith could not survive on £6k pw, his deal at Bristol City is worth £18k pw.

                  Re: Nathan Jones

                  Posted by Ches Fordroad on 5/10/2022, 8:27:55, in reply to "Nathan Jones "

                  Don't be so ####ing stupid.

                  It's Pelly's fault. And Bree's. And the worst goalkeeper in the club's history.

                    Re: Nathan Jones

                    Posted by Ches Fordroad on 5/10/2022, 8:58:09, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                    I thought Huddersfield Town played well and deserved at least a point.

                      Re: Nathan Jones

                      Posted by Ches Fordroad on 5/10/2022, 9:15:59, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                      Pathetic, Broadcaster./Joker./Joker

                        Re: Nathan Jones

                        Posted by F.I. on 5/10/2022, 9:07:10, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                        got to agree with that. i said the same last. they didnt look a bottom 2 side but they were very lucky with all 3 of their goals.

                          Re: Nathan Jones

                          Posted by Ches Fordroad on 5/10/2022, 9:17:18, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                          You are joking, surely. They were ####ing awful, even worse than Wigan and Birmingham.

                            Re: Nathan Jones

                            Posted by F.I. on 5/10/2022, 9:43:27, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                            but they were nowhere near as bad as that Italian Twatford team.

                              Re: Nathan Jones

                              Posted by Bogo on 5/10/2022, 9:40:36, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                              Huddersfield are your definition of awful! They are a very powerful team. Strong pacey good passing and pressing. Excellent at corners. I believe that last season they scored more goals than any other club from set pieces. We have 1 or 2 things that need resolving. Pelly is not ready for the first team. Goalkeeper needs to be more aggressive and bulldoze into players. Defending needs work doing. Adeybayo needs to learn how to head a ball at goal. He had a couple of good heading chances but the went high over the bar. Apart from that we are OK. A good game last night. Somewhat bewildering but a good game of football .

                                Re: Nathan Jones

                                Posted by Mahatma Gander on 5/10/2022, 9:58:18, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                                The stats reflect the game I saw . . .

                                Shots
                                Home24
                                Away4

                                Shots on Target
                                Home11
                                Away3

                                  Re: Nathan Jones

                                  Posted by Notorious D on 5/10/2022, 9:52:09, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                                  What areas of the pitch were they ‘strong and pacey? We literally gift wrapped them three goals, from three set pieces. They were toothless up front and didn’t create a single opportunity all game. They looked a poor side, hence why they are near the bottom.

                                  We were better than them in pretty much every aspect, apart from defending set pieces. Last night was a very baffling result.

                                    Re: Nathan Jones

                                    Posted by Ches Fordroad on 5/10/2022, 9:50:24, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                                    "Excellent at corners"

                                    And that's it, literally all they offered, all they had to offer.

                                      Re: Nathan Jones

                                      Posted by Just an observation on 5/10/2022, 10:22:04, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                                      So why did we keep giving away needless corners?

                                      To be fair they looked pacey and quite good in the middle third but that is all

                                Re: Nathan Jones

                                Posted by Hatterman on 5/10/2022, 9:05:54, in reply to "Re: Nathan Jones "

                                Don’t know why people keep rattling on about Naismith , sure he had good games but had plenty of lousy ones too where he was continually giving the ball away
                                Not sure why Polly was brought on ,seems no where ready and lost his man for Huddersfield’s equaliser !
                                Far too many hopeful long balls

                          [ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

                          DISCLAIMER

                          The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

                          Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

                            Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

                            What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.

                          eXTReMe Tracker