This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other
content posted on it.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks.
If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a
Posted by Oxonhatter on 1/10/2022, 14:37:39
Potts was outstanding last night. Barely put a foot wrong. Do we need to replace Naismith?|
Posted by bbb on 2/10/2022, 8:09:20, in reply to "Potts"
I wouldn't say 'outstanding 'but he's doing well enough. I still don't believe he's good enough tbh but onions an all that.|
Posted by mmee on 1/10/2022, 14:41:02, in reply to "Potts"
Heís doing well but heís not Kal Naismith. That said, I donít think we need to rush out and sign a centre half. Although Iím a bit concerned about Burke staying fit. |
Posted by Stevio on 1/10/2022, 14:42:52, in reply to "Re: Potts"
I feel we are light in that area. If Burke is out for 4-6 weeks we only have Bradley as back up. Thatís not enough cover for our system.|
Posted by RM on 1/10/2022, 17:21:26, in reply to "Re: Potts"
We have Osho and Bree who can do that job. Fred can play right wing back. Bradley couldn't replace Burke as he is left footed, it would mean Lockyer would have to go right side centre back. |
Burke has been excellent, but we have cover.
Posted by Lol on 1/10/2022, 14:41:48, in reply to "Re: Potts"
He is doing great and fair play to him.|
Posted by Stimm on 1/10/2022, 16:34:49, in reply to "Re: Potts"
Lansbury making the difference to replace naismiths bringing the ball forward play. |
Allows the central defence to break forward.
Different players different play.
[ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]