This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

    Dorries

    Posted by EastEnder on 24/11/2021, 15:38:13

    wants to evaluate government funding for Channel 4.

    Which doesn't get any government funding.





      Re: Dorries

      Posted by Sheff on 24/11/2021, 19:34:17, in reply to "Dorries"

      She's had a pee in my downstairs toilet.

        Re: Dorries

        Posted by Nearly a Genius on 24/11/2021, 18:43:21, in reply to "Dorries"

        Don't they get part of the licence fee?

          Re: Dorries

          Posted by Teacher on 24/11/2021, 23:17:10, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

          No.

            Re: Dorries

            Posted by Garstang Hatter on 24/11/2021, 19:21:40, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

            No - https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/what-does-your-licence-fee-pay-for-top13

            "Part of the fee also contributes towards Freeview and Freesat, and towards the UK broadband rollout, funding local TV channels and S4C, the Welsh language TV channel, as agreed with the government as part of the 2010 licence fee settlement."

              Re: Dorries

              Posted by Abbott on 24/11/2021, 19:17:19, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

              I'm not completely sure and most likely wrong, but I believe it's entirely self-funded.

              Re: Dorries

              Posted by Noddy on 24/11/2021, 17:29:15, in reply to "Dorries"

              Is it just me or has she come out with something utterly stupid to take attention away from her incompetent boss?

                Re: Dorries

                Posted by Billy Wallace on 24/11/2021, 16:54:31, in reply to "Dorries"

                Yes but what about Dianne Abbott , imagine she was asked about channel 4 . She’d of thought they were talking about a perfume!!!!!

                  Re: Dorries

                  Posted by HeathHatter on 24/11/2021, 18:15:58, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                  This thread is about the actual Culture Secretary and actual current events. Yet you're more fixated on someone who is not even a member of the Shadow Cabinet.

                    Re: Dorries

                    Posted by Billy Wallace on 24/11/2021, 18:59:24, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                    So Dianne Abbott isnt currently in opposition and hoping to be in government after the next election???? So Dianne Abbott hasn’t proved time and time again that she is the thickest politician ever??? So Dianne Abbott didn’t suggest that police officers would be paid £30????

                    Typical lefties moaning about the Tories but forgetting how thick there own politicians are.

                      Re: Dorries

                      Posted by Yer but on 24/11/2021, 19:33:36, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                      Pepper pig.

                        Re: Dorries

                        Posted by David Cameron on 24/11/2021, 19:35:07, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                        Yes!

                        I knew I'd remember her name eventually!

                          Re: Dorries

                          Posted by Yer but on 24/11/2021, 19:45:13, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                          12 years of an absolute shit show and still the thick defend them.

                          They are just a cult.

                        Re: Dorries

                        Posted by Looking In on 24/11/2021, 19:32:44, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                        I see what you did there

                        There’s bigger, more important news about right now mate

                    Re: Dorries

                    Posted by Boris gump on 24/11/2021, 16:51:23, in reply to "Dorries"

                    Imagine the offspring of her and gumbo ?

                    A new breed of horror.

                      Re: Dorries

                      Posted by Archdeacon on 24/11/2021, 16:18:05, in reply to "Dorries"

                      Congratulations, you got something right

                        Re: Dorries

                        Posted by Abbott on 24/11/2021, 16:15:06, in reply to "Dorries"

                        Have you considered taking up a hobby? Or maybe going for a walk and getting some fresh air?

                          Re: Dorries

                          Posted by jimmyp on 24/11/2021, 16:30:36, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                          Yeah, who gives a fuck if our government are, at best, incompetent beyond parody?

                          Cheers, Jim

                            Re: Dorries

                            Posted by Abbott on 24/11/2021, 16:54:44, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                            You, apparently...

                              Re: Dorries

                              Posted by jimmyp on 24/11/2021, 17:02:21, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                              Yeah, I'm a weirdo to think that our government should be at least not jaw-droppingly incompetent, on their best day.

                              Cheers, Jim

                                Re: Dorries

                                Posted by Abbott on 24/11/2021, 18:53:49, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                I never suggested you were.

                                For the record, I believe Boris is a prat but moaning about it/him isn't going to help.

                                  Re: Dorries

                                  Posted by jimmyp on 24/11/2021, 19:19:40, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                  But the way to combat people moaning about it/him is to moan about it?

                                  Not sure your logic is the most sound, there.

                                  Cheers, Jim

                                    Re: Dorries

                                    Posted by Abbott on 24/11/2021, 23:50:50, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                    Your logic never appears to be sound, but the rest of us move on.

                                  Re: Dorries

                                  Posted by MCH on 24/11/2021, 17:06:05, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                  No political party can be trusted, they're all thieves and they are full of crap.

                                    Re: Dorries

                                    Posted by jimmyp on 24/11/2021, 17:13:49, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                    You've got to admit, for bare-faced corruption this lot are peerless.

                                    And when they're not being crooks, they're just being spectacularly shit.

                                    Cheers, Jim

                                      Re: Dorries

                                      Posted by Indeed on 24/11/2021, 18:20:34, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                      They’re not even that good.

                              Re: Dorries

                              Posted by EastEnder on 24/11/2021, 16:20:47, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                              You obviously haven't heard of this new invention the mobile phone.

                                Re: Dorries

                                Posted by Looking In on 24/11/2021, 17:42:53, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                Of course he has. He’s got 27 O Levels and 16 A Levels you know.

                                  Re: Dorries

                                  Posted by Abbott on 24/11/2021, 18:50:16, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                  What'a an O level, 4-4-2? A bit before my time I believe.

                                    Re: Dorries

                                    Posted by Looking In on 24/11/2021, 19:29:43, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                    Not according to one of your previous posts Fatso, you said you had loads of them, remember?

                                      Re: Dorries

                                      Posted by Abbott on 24/11/2021, 23:52:17, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                      Yeah trillions of them, '442'.

                                  Re: Dorries

                                  Posted by Abbott on 24/11/2021, 16:54:13, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                  No. Do tell me more...

                                    Re: Dorries

                                    Posted by Why on 24/11/2021, 19:41:06, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                    You’ve been busted again, lover.

                                      Re: Dorries

                                      Posted by Abbott on 24/11/2021, 23:53:29, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                      Oh dear, I'm embarrassed for you. Cringe.

                                        Re: Dorries

                                        Posted by Looking In on 25/11/2021, 0:44:25, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                        He’s right though, isn’t he? You are guilty of telling a few whoppers on here aren’t you

                                          Re: Dorries

                                          Posted by Abbott on 25/11/2021, 10:13:28, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                          Nope. However, crack on 442.

                                            Re: Dorries

                                            Posted by Why on 25/11/2021, 6:56:59, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                            The best one was back in the days when an IP address was shown with every message.

                                            Same IP address, “me and him/her” posting. He denied all knowledge. When it was pointed out that it had to be from the same place, he/she said it was someone using the same pc in his/her house, then had to admit abbott/why were sleeping together.

                                            Strange character tbh.

                                              Re: Dorries

                                              Posted by Abbott on 25/11/2021, 10:18:01, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                              Hello, stalker.

                                              Stop munching on crayons and maybe attempt to revise your last message in a more coherent manner...

                                                Re: Dorries

                                                Posted by Why on 25/11/2021, 13:11:00, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                Give it up shortarse.

                                                  Re: Dorries

                                                  Posted by Abbott on 25/11/2021, 19:13:53, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                  Didn't realise 6ft was short. Oh well...

                                                    Re: Dorries

                                                    Posted by Why on 25/11/2021, 22:23:00, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                    More lies. Oh dear.

                                  Re: Dorries

                                  Posted by boz on 24/11/2021, 16:01:54, in reply to "Dorries"

                                  shes a slapper mp

                                    Re: Dorries

                                    Posted by Bored in Flitwick on 24/11/2021, 16:12:02, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                    No other choice around here if you are a Conservative voter..but one lazy cxx..but how do you get rid...she a boris fan as well

                                      Re: Dorries

                                      Posted by boz on 24/11/2021, 16:18:58, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                      shes a sycophant for BJ. as is patel and some of the other thickos, rabb, williamson, A untalented, lazy bag

                                        Re: Dorries

                                        Posted by Archdeacon on 24/11/2021, 16:25:57, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                        'An untalented, lazy bag' who has raised a family, does a full-time job, is a best selling author and is relatively wealthy so therefore not a drain on the public purse.

                                          Re: Dorries

                                          Posted by Nearly a Genius on 24/11/2021, 18:46:30, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                          Apart from employing her daughter out of the public purse, and buggering off to Australia for months to be in a dopey reality show, leaving her constituents without representation.

                                            Re: Dorries

                                            Posted by Bored in Flitwick on 24/11/2021, 17:39:16, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                            Wealthy on the back of us..in my opinion abuses the system for own gain

                                              Re: Dorries

                                              Posted by jimmyp on 24/11/2021, 16:55:07, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                              Even the complete cretins on here who bang on about defunding the BBC know that Channel 4 don't get Government funding.

                                              A low bar and she doesn't even clear that and exactly the sort of thing that the divs would be howling about if it were Diane Abbott. But, she's on your team so you've got to defend her, no matter how indefensible.

                                              Cheers, Jim

                                                Re: Dorries

                                                Posted by EastEnder on 24/11/2021, 16:35:42, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                Lazy people can't do full-time jobs?

                                                  Re: Dorries

                                                  Posted by Let's not forget... on 24/11/2021, 16:33:00, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                  ...she binned her husband when they found out he had multiple sclerosis.

                                                  Just for balance, like.

                                                    Re: Dorries

                                                    Posted by boz on 24/11/2021, 16:35:39, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                    Eewww dirty badger

                                                      Re: Dorries

                                                      Posted by Archdeacon on 24/11/2021, 16:34:27, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                      and absolutely nothing to do with what I was responding to.

                                                        Re: Dorries

                                                        Posted by Let's not forget... on 24/11/2021, 16:41:21, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                        Which bit of 'Just for balance, like.' did you fail to understand?

                                                          Re: Dorries

                                                          Posted by Archdeacon on 24/11/2021, 16:47:18, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                          nothing to do with balance, you went off at a complete tangent.

                                                            Re: Dorries

                                                            Posted by Let's not forget... on 24/11/2021, 18:13:14, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                            How is pointing out a less than pleasant fact in response to your sycophantic praise going 'off at a complete tangent'?

                                                      Re: Dorries

                                                      Posted by boz on 24/11/2021, 16:28:23, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                      in my book, shes a cu nt

                                                      you have her as 'your hero' i care not

                                                      last words, maybe, out

                                                        Re: Dorries

                                                        Posted by Archdeacon on 24/11/2021, 16:32:08, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                        nothing to do with 'hero'. Just putting you right with undeniable facts. You made a statement, nay insult, for no other reason than spite.

                                                          Re: Dorries

                                                          Posted by boz on 24/11/2021, 16:39:30, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                          no i didnt, shes a sycophant workshy turntailed wazzer.

                                                          F A C T

                                                          Now F O

                                                            Re: Dorries

                                                            Posted by Archdeacon on 24/11/2021, 16:45:58, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                            give up, you really shouldn't mix with adults, you are short of a few brain cells.

                                                              Re: Dorries

                                                              Posted by boz on 24/11/2021, 16:52:00, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                              and youre a blinded, ill- informed, stupid dick head matie

                                                                Re: Dorries

                                                                Posted by TPDC on 24/11/2021, 17:40:14, in reply to "Re: Dorries"

                                                                +1

                                            [ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

                                            DISCLAIMER

                                            The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

                                            Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

                                              Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

                                              What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.

                                            eXTReMe Tracker