This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

    JR

    Posted by Luton till I die on 6/11/2019, 8:10:08

    Will we find out today, if capital and regional have put one in?

      Re: JR

      Posted by EastEnder on 6/11/2019, 9:21:49, in reply to "JR"

      No. Friday allegedly.

        Re: JR

        Posted by RADSB on 6/11/2019, 9:28:44, in reply to "Re: JR"

        LBC could call the court and ask them to check. I would if I were the potential defendant.

        C&R refusing to make a statement sums up their attitude - they don't give a shite about the club, town or the people - just money, money money.

          Re: JR

          Posted by Ches Fordroad on 6/11/2019, 10:20:34, in reply to "Re: JR"

          I think their silence tells us that they’ve done the deed

            Re: JR

            Posted by RADSB on 6/11/2019, 10:23:38, in reply to "Re: JR"

            If I was C&R and I hadn't issued a JR, I would think bollocks to them, let them sweat. So I would keep quiet.

              Re: JR

              Posted by EastEnder on 6/11/2019, 10:31:52, in reply to "Re: JR"

              There would have been no point them employing a lawyer to write the recent letter if they weren't going to follow through on it, would there?

                Re: JR

                Posted by The Outsider on 6/11/2019, 11:17:22, in reply to "Re: JR"

                Whilst I don't expect it to be the case, it could be that, having seen LBC's response, they realise that they are wasting their time. We can but hope however unlikely it is.

                  Re: JR

                  Posted by RADSB on 6/11/2019, 11:37:40, in reply to "Re: JR"

                  I think because of the staffing problems at LBC and the size of the issues, LBC referred much work to a barrister who specialised in planning. So it should be watertight.

                  Re: JR

                  Posted by RADSB on 6/11/2019, 10:38:32, in reply to "Re: JR"

                  The grounds in that letter are so thin - GS said he would be gobsmacked if they issued on those grounds. I have always thought Ken Ford is in the background here or even still leading this. They have done everything on the cheap and bluff has been high on the agenda. Their threat has been far worse than their deeds. But we'll see soon and I might be wrong. I've emailed Larry but I don't expect a reply.

                    Re: JR

                    Posted by Don Logan on 6/11/2019, 13:10:22, in reply to "Re: JR"

                    The moment Ken Ford stated publicly at the Hightown Club, that 2020 did not own the land, and was corrected by Sian Timoney, was when I knew the football club would win the war.

                      Re: JR

                      Posted by RADSB on 6/11/2019, 13:30:46, in reply to "Re: JR"

                      Yes, that was funny - the longer it has gone on the more we have seen huff, puff, bluff and guff at the least possible outlay.

                      The other laugh was Ken Ford Ford using "I don't recognise those words" when GS told the meeting about his promise to kick the whole thing into the long grass. I hope the PAP letter is the last of the long grass.

                        Re: JR

                        Posted by Kaptain Krusty on 6/11/2019, 13:30:46, in reply to "Re: JR"

                        Sounds like a tumbleweed moment

                        Re: JR

                        Posted by Mahatma Gander on 6/11/2019, 12:16:55, in reply to "Re: JR"

                        Hmmm, they must have addded at least a year to the process so far, probably more?

                        Whatever their decision they have already caused considerable damage with their short-sighted, dogmatic approach.

                          Re: JR

                          Posted by RADSB on 6/11/2019, 12:19:06, in reply to "Re: JR"

                          A year? How?

                            Re: JR

                            Posted by EastEnder on 6/11/2019, 12:23:51, in reply to "Re: JR"

                            The decisions would have been taken much earlier if they hadn't made the applications go into much more detail than they would have needed to have done otherwise - however, at least much of the work which would have been done after the planning decisions otherwise ended up being done before.

                              Re: JR

                              Posted by RADSB on 6/11/2019, 12:51:08, in reply to "Re: JR"

                              I don't give C&R that much credit. I look at the cutbacks to LBC staff (caused by the Govt) and those staff who left to join developers. This left LBC with the bare minimum and certainly no where near enough resources to deal with such huge projects. There were very long quiet periods all down to LBC/cutbacks/the Govt - I'm not blaming anyone. LBC turned to expert barristers for guidance so it should mean that the planning procedures are watertight.

                              Had C&R stayed silent - no opposition then possibly the planning procedures may have been lax and sloppy. Thus opening the door to a successful JR and the huge cost and delay that would have caused - far bigger than we have experienced. The worse case scenario being that the planning procedure might have had to start again.

                              Not wishing to give them any credit but C&R made sure that LBC covered every angle in the planning process.

                                Re: JR

                                Posted by Mahatma Gander on 6/11/2019, 14:07:00, in reply to "Re: JR"

                                Hmmm, I get all that but haven't Sweet and LBC people already stated that it's cost lots of additional money and time?

                                  Re: JR

                                  Posted by RADSB on 6/11/2019, 14:20:58, in reply to "Re: JR"

                                  GS isn't going to reveal everything is he - possible book besides maintaining relations with LBC. I've just put forward an alternative view - that's all.

                                  Do you recall the Local Plan meeting when LBC's legal team came across as dithery and out of their depth? I did worry at that time. As I have already mentioned, staff left LBC planning and legal departments. Those that remained were not up to it. They needed that expert help time and again. In fact they probably needed expert help to tell them what expert help they needed. I think GS did criticise LBC's slowness.

                                    Re: JR

                                    Posted by Mahatma Gander on 6/11/2019, 14:45:50, in reply to "Re: JR"

                                    Yes, that's true for sure.

                                    Maybe they haven't had any impact, I'd definitely like you to be right .

              Re: JR

              Posted by Flitwick Hatter on 6/11/2019, 8:26:30, in reply to "JR"

              Friday we will know, but its obvious they would of

                Re: JR

                Posted by Lutownian on 6/11/2019, 9:59:27, in reply to "Re: JR"

                have.

                Re: JR

                Posted by The Outsider on 6/11/2019, 8:25:41, in reply to "JR"

                Friday is the date by which C&R have to notify LBC. Not sure if the court will notify them before that.

                  Re: JR

                  Posted by Luton till I die on 6/11/2019, 8:39:51, in reply to "Re: JR"

                  Could LBC or football club ask the court if one has been sent?

                    Re: JR

                    Posted by EastEnder on 6/11/2019, 9:22:29, in reply to "Re: JR"

                    why don't you ask the court?

                      Re: JR

                      Posted by Luton till I die on 6/11/2019, 9:34:20, in reply to "Re: JR"

                      Eastender I was only asking a question, no need to be like that to s fellow hatter, you twat

                        Re: JR

                        Posted by Cybermat on 6/11/2019, 9:38:28, in reply to "Re: JR"

                        I think the local meeja will find out - they seem to be pushing for answers.

                  Re: JR

                  Posted by Ronnie’s Finger on 6/11/2019, 8:11:10, in reply to "JR"

                  Take iit as read...

                [ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

                DISCLAIMER

                The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

                Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

                  Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

                  What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.

                eXTReMe Tracker