This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

    Sluga - are we partially responsible?

    Posted by charlatans spivs and thieves on 6/10/2019, 8:12:04

    It was the fans on ALL social media platforms who agitated for a new goalkeeper. How many times did we read that Shea was not good enough for the Championship?

      Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

      Posted by bbb on 6/10/2019, 11:23:12, in reply to "Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

      If anyone thinks 2020 spunked the biggest transfer fee in the history of the club because of a few social media comments, they are very much mistaken and probably a bit retarded.

        Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

        Posted by builders choice on 6/10/2019, 11:18:44, in reply to "Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

        he may not be good enough,i think we have a problem with some others who are not good enough,potts bree Bolton plus non starters on the bench.

          Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

          Posted by Andy Cappucino on 6/10/2019, 10:12:03, in reply to "Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

          Don't be daft

            Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

            Posted by J Block on 6/10/2019, 8:54:18, in reply to "Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

            FFS....yeah it's our fault, probably the most stupid post of the year, congratulations.

              Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

              Posted by charlatans spivs and thieves on 6/10/2019, 9:21:10, in reply to "Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

              That curly thing on the end is a question mark. You were obviously absent when English was taught at school.

            Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

            Posted by No on 6/10/2019, 8:38:51, in reply to "Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

            That's such a teenager's comment! Bless ya. You have no idea how this big, strange world works do you sunshine!!

              Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

              Posted by North Beds Hatter on 6/10/2019, 8:32:48, in reply to "Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

              Illogical comment. Thereís no evidence yet that Shea is good enough for the Championship (I hope he is). The need for a new keeper isnít disproven by Sluga making errors.

                Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

                Posted by charlatans spivs and thieves on 6/10/2019, 8:40:00, in reply to "Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

                agree, but possibly a panic signing when the first choice, the Belgium chappie, fell through(?)

                  Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

                  Posted by Sandgrounder on 6/10/2019, 8:44:44, in reply to "Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

                  Van Crombrugge signed for Anderlecht for over £2M so I guess he was never coming here

                Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

                Posted by HH on 6/10/2019, 8:17:53, in reply to "Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

                I would like to think the club's transfer policy isn't dictated by the knee jerk reactions from social media.

                People wanted a new goalkeeper to push Shea and because Stech didn't seem good enough.

                  Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

                  Posted by Baldy on 6/10/2019, 8:17:24, in reply to "Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

                  No not at all he has been mismanaged by Jones and confidence completely shot, end of.

                    Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

                    Posted by Lee Henfield on 6/10/2019, 8:14:36, in reply to "Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

                    The same amount of time that it was suggested that Collo wasnít either Iíd guess. We didnít get a new striker though!

                      Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?

                      Posted by HHH on 6/10/2019, 8:29:03, in reply to "Re: Sluga - are we partially responsible?"

                      He has obviously lost confidence because of glaring errors.Oh for the consistency of a Sealey or Tyler.

                  [ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

                  DISCLAIMER

                  The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

                  Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

                    Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

                    What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.

                  eXTReMe Tracker