If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.
- Re: In defence of JW
- In defence of JW - Herts Hatter Today, 7:40:37
- Re: In defence of JW - Shutupya Today, 9:18:53
- Re: In defence of JW - E5 Hat Today, 8:21:58
- Re: In defence of JW - Earls Today, 7:55:52
- Re: In defence of JW - Ostrich spotter Today, 8:46:27
- Re: In defence of JW - Jake Today, 10:25:19
- Re: In defence of JW - Jake Today, 10:25:19
- Re: In defence of JW - HH Today, 8:12:47
- Re: In defence of JW - Earls Today, 8:29:12
- Re: In defence of JW - Earls Today, 8:29:12
- Re: In defence of JW - Hatterchatter Today, 7:50:52

« Back to index | View thread » - Re: In defence of JW - Shutupya Today, 9:18:53
Equally, Wilshere didn’t help yesterday with obvious errors like leaving Al-Hamadi and Richards on too long, and playing Jones out of position again. And the 10-minute wait post-goal for the subs he’d planned was inexcusable.
We can see from the home games what Wilshere is trying. Why that falls to bits away is worrying, as there’s just no sign of that ending. But, while I’d have kept Nordas and Makosso, we all seemed to agree the January window was good for moving the bad eggs out. So Wilshere does deserve the summer window - under a DoF.
Message Thread
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.
on 19/2/2026, 7:55:52, in reply to "