If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.
- Re: Thank god we don't need to keep Lonwijk or Al Hamadi
- Thank god we don't need to keep Lonwijk or Al Hamadi - Fishing Hat Today, 6:32:49
- Re: Thank god we don't need to keep Lonwijk or Al Hamadi - Sick Boy Today, 7:16:34
- Re: Thank god we don't need to keep Lonwijk or Al Hamadi - bbb Today, 7:23:22
- Re: Thank god we don't need to keep Lonwijk or Al Hamadi - bbb Today, 7:23:22
- Re: Thank god we don't need to keep Lonwijk or Al Hamadi - bbb Today, 6:42:23
- Re: Thank god we don't need to keep Lonwijk or Al Hamadi - Lord Fungusbottom Today, 6:46:03
- Re: Thank god we don't need to keep Lonwijk or Al Hamadi - Mr T Today, 6:52:39
- Re: Thank god we don't need to keep Lonwijk or Al Hamadi - Mr T Today, 6:52:39

« Back to index | View thread » - Re: Thank god we don't need to keep Lonwijk or Al Hamadi - Sick Boy Today, 7:16:34
![]()
on 19/2/2026, 6:42:23, in reply to "Thank god we don't need to keep Lonwijk or Al Hamadi"
Al Hamadi has done about as much as Yates so far.
But, but, but we wouldn't have been able to sign him if he wasn't injured, is one of the most laughable comments to come out the Fuhrers gob in the last few years and there's been plenty.
Message Thread
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.