If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.
- Improved communication: a test case
Let’s be clear: Undisclosed Fees aren’t the club’s fault. As someone (MG? Crumpsall?) pointed out recently, every EFL fee is now undisclosed.
But it might be that we’re making a loss on a player who improved a lot during his time with us, playing at a higher standard. Equally, the rumour might not be true and we’re making a profit, as we should.
If the club is serious about communication improving, it needs to include a line in the statement confirming Aasgaard’s sale, stating: “The fee is undisclosed, but we can confirm we made a profit on the fee we had paid to Wigan in January.”
And if it is true we made a loss, then that needs explaining why. Either explain why in the transfer statement, or let it be known via someone like Mike Collings at Luton Today. Let him do a story with “club sources” explaining why the fuck we’ve made a loss on one of our only success stories of the past 18 months.
Getting less than we paid for for Morris, Hashioka and Kaminski is totally understandable. But being stitched up for Aasgaard? That’s pathetic. If the rumours are true and there is a valid reason, let’s hear it.
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.