If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.
- Re: Sack Edwards now
- Sack Edwards now - Anon 6/11/2024, 19:04:20
- Re: Sack Edwards now - E1 6/11/2024, 20:41:50
- Re: Sack Edwards now - J in C 6/11/2024, 19:40:09
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Brains 6/11/2024, 19:43:57
- Re: Sack Edwards now - J in C 6/11/2024, 19:47:54
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Arthur Crabtree 6/11/2024, 22:30:51
- Re: Sack Edwards now - The truth 6/11/2024, 20:19:57
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Arthur Crabtree 6/11/2024, 22:30:51
- Re: Sack Edwards now - J in C 6/11/2024, 19:47:54
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Brains 6/11/2024, 19:43:57
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Brains 6/11/2024, 19:29:49
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Andy Cappuccino 6/11/2024, 19:26:42
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Benfleethatter 6/11/2024, 19:19:33
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Hippo 6/11/2024, 19:26:27
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Hippo 6/11/2024, 19:07:35
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Hartwell Hat 6/11/2024, 19:08:24
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Hippo 6/11/2024, 19:34:06
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Hippo 6/11/2024, 19:34:06
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Hartwell Hat 6/11/2024, 19:08:24
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Winger 6/11/2024, 19:04:59
- Re: Sack Edwards now - TRA 6/11/2024, 19:08:25
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Bootin 6/11/2024, 19:08:19
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Mad dog 6/11/2024, 21:07:49
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Observer 6/11/2024, 22:02:47
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Observer 6/11/2024, 22:21:37
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Observer 6/11/2024, 22:48:09
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Observer 6/11/2024, 22:48:09
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Observer 6/11/2024, 22:21:37
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Observer 6/11/2024, 22:02:47
- Re: Sack Edwards now - Mad dog 6/11/2024, 21:07:49
- Re: Sack Edwards now - TRA 6/11/2024, 19:08:25
« Back to index | View thread » - Re: Sack Edwards now - E1 6/11/2024, 20:41:50
Taylor was loaned out last season to prove himself. He did so. The loans couldn’t have gone any better. Yet Taylor has been given minimal time since, when the strikers - for largely valid reasons - have been out of form.
Not trying Taylor as an alternative to Woodrow makes zero sense on any level.
(I hope Woodrow comes on and scores and his defenders can (continue to) laugh at me.
Message Thread | This response ↓
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.