If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.
- Re: If we had...
- If we had... - thebeast 24/9/2023, 7:15:05
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 9:14:48
- Re: If we had... - Cuba Spotter 24/9/2023, 9:53:02
- Re: If we had... - Ches Fordroad 24/9/2023, 11:21:07
- Re: If we had... - Ches Fordroad 24/9/2023, 11:29:06
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 11:33:50
- Re: If we had... - Cuba Spotter 24/9/2023, 11:39:02
- Re: If we had... - Cuba Spotter 24/9/2023, 11:39:02
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 11:33:50
- Re: If we had... - Ches Fordroad 24/9/2023, 11:29:06
- Re: If we had... - Ches Fordroad 24/9/2023, 11:21:07
- Re: If we had... - Ches Fordroad 24/9/2023, 9:48:25
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 11:36:25
- Re: If we had... - Spud 24/9/2023, 11:51:00
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 11:59:54
- Re: If we had... - Spud 24/9/2023, 12:19:13
- Re: If we had... - bbb 24/9/2023, 12:42:28
- Re: If we had... - bbb 24/9/2023, 12:42:28
- Re: If we had... - Spud 24/9/2023, 12:19:13
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 11:59:54
- Re: If we had... - Spud 24/9/2023, 11:51:00
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 11:36:25
- Re: If we had... - Of course 24/9/2023, 9:17:50
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 9:21:07
- Re: If we had... - Of course 24/9/2023, 9:25:57
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 9:34:36
- Re: If we had... - bbb 24/9/2023, 12:51:48
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 13:05:23
- Re: If we had... - crumpsall 24/9/2023, 13:23:05
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 13:55:05
- Re: If we had... - crumpsall 24/9/2023, 14:24:58
- Re: If we had... - Cigar Chap 24/9/2023, 15:32:40
- Re: If we had... - bbb 24/9/2023, 16:28:15
- Re: If we had... - crumpsall 24/9/2023, 15:36:48
- Re: If we had... - bbb 24/9/2023, 16:28:15
- Re: If we had... - Cigar Chap 24/9/2023, 15:32:40
- Re: If we had... - bbb 24/9/2023, 14:13:47
- Re: If we had... - crumpsall 24/9/2023, 14:24:58
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 13:55:05
- Re: If we had... - bbb 24/9/2023, 13:11:30
- Re: If we had... - crumpsall 24/9/2023, 13:23:05
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 13:05:23
- Re: If we had... - MG 24/9/2023, 9:45:40
- Re: If we had... - Of course 24/9/2023, 9:52:59
- Re: If we had... - Of course 24/9/2023, 9:52:59
- Re: If we had... - Of course 24/9/2023, 9:43:48
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 10:09:17
- Re: If we had... - Of course 24/9/2023, 10:33:33
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 10:50:03
- Re: If we had... - Of course 24/9/2023, 10:53:14
- Re: If we had... - Of course 24/9/2023, 10:53:14
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 10:50:03
- Re: If we had... - Cuba Spotter 24/9/2023, 10:12:42
- Re: If we had... - Of course 24/9/2023, 10:33:33
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 10:09:17
- Re: If we had... - bbb 24/9/2023, 12:51:48
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 9:34:36
- Re: If we had... - Of course 24/9/2023, 9:25:57
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 9:21:07
- Re: If we had... - bbb 24/9/2023, 8:07:02
- Re: If we had... - For 24/9/2023, 7:45:14
- Re: If we had... - Dave 24/9/2023, 7:41:40
- Re: If we had... - Alien Nate 24/9/2023, 7:20:13
- Re: If we had... - R27 24/9/2023, 9:09:47
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 9:15:53
- Re: If we had... - Cigar chap 24/9/2023, 9:15:53
- Re: If we had... - thebeast 24/9/2023, 7:23:19
- Re: If we had... - R27 24/9/2023, 9:09:47
- Re: If we had... - Sandgrounder 24/9/2023, 7:19:18
- Re: If we had... - thebeast 24/9/2023, 7:21:15
- Re: If we had... - Sandgrounder 24/9/2023, 7:23:29
- Re: If we had... - thebeast 24/9/2023, 7:25:26
- Re: If we had... - Sandgrounder 24/9/2023, 7:27:53
- Re: If we had... - thebeast 24/9/2023, 7:34:21
- Re: If we had... - thebeast 24/9/2023, 7:34:21
- Re: If we had... - Albert 24/9/2023, 7:27:48
- Re: If we had... - Sandgrounder 24/9/2023, 7:27:53
- Re: If we had... - thebeast 24/9/2023, 7:25:26
- Re: If we had... - Sandgrounder 24/9/2023, 7:23:29
- Re: If we had... - thebeast 24/9/2023, 7:21:15
- Re: If we had... - J in C back from walking Mylo 24/9/2023, 7:18:49
- Re: If we had... - Observer 24/9/2023, 8:19:46
- Re: If we had... - Observer 24/9/2023, 8:19:46
« Back to index | View thread »
We did that presumably because we thought we were going to get someone like Archer in on loan. Moreover RE said with two weeks to go to the Brighton games that he wanted four more in. We got Menghi and Albert - so presumably again at least one of those who didn’t arrive was a central striker.
We should have held off letting Taylor go until we were satisfied we had a squad of 25 and sufficient goal scoring options.
To be left with 24 and no obvious back up in the U21’s when we have “£170m” to play with just seems a bit of a mistake.
The common assumption is that we won’t spend the money on wages that a striker will demand, that just doesn’t work - strikers are paid more because they score goals and goals win matches.
But if we really are not wanting to pay that level of wage then don’t let Taylor or McAtee go out on loan.
Our last resort now is the scraps of the Free Agent market, it should never have go to that.
Message Thread | This response ↓
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.