If you are under this age please leave the board.
Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.
- Re: Burke as “cover”
- Burnley, Drameh - Brko's Bicycle 5/6/2023, 13:28:45
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Nick NLPBH 5/6/2023, 13:58:33
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - College Hatter 5/6/2023, 13:37:22
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - South London Hatter 5/6/2023, 15:28:56
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - MG 5/6/2023, 17:40:59
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Eh? 6/6/2023, 7:50:44
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - James C the legend one 5/6/2023, 17:55:25
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Eh? 6/6/2023, 7:50:44
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - MG 5/6/2023, 17:40:59
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - StanBaker 5/6/2023, 14:02:38
- Burke as “cover” - That idiot Cuba 5/6/2023, 14:07:17
- Re: Burke as “cover” - jimmyp 5/6/2023, 15:13:04
- Re: Burke as “cover” - StanBaker 5/6/2023, 14:26:07
- Re: Burke as “cover” - Doctor Ince 5/6/2023, 15:06:41
- Re: Burke as “cover” - The Outsider 5/6/2023, 15:40:15
- Re: Burke as “cover” - The Outsider 5/6/2023, 15:40:15
- Re: Burke as “cover” - The Outsider 5/6/2023, 14:27:47
- Re: Burke as “cover” - StanBaker 5/6/2023, 14:42:38
- Re: Burke as “cover” - That idiot Cuba 5/6/2023, 15:06:06
- Steve cook - Deli 5/6/2023, 19:24:35
- Re: Burke as “cover” - PHS 5/6/2023, 15:29:44
- Re: Burke as “cover” - Lord Fungusbottom 5/6/2023, 17:55:49
- Steve cook - Deli 5/6/2023, 19:24:35
- Re: Burke as “cover” - That idiot Cuba 5/6/2023, 15:06:06
- Re: Burke as “cover” - StanBaker 5/6/2023, 14:42:38
- Re: Burke as “cover” - Doctor Ince 5/6/2023, 15:06:41
- Re: Burke as “cover” - jimmyp 5/6/2023, 15:13:04
- Burke as “cover” - That idiot Cuba 5/6/2023, 14:07:17
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - HH 5/6/2023, 13:46:55
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Doctor Ince 5/6/2023, 15:04:11
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Mr T 5/6/2023, 19:43:12
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Mr T 5/6/2023, 19:43:12
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Madpig 5/6/2023, 13:54:00
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Rioch for England 5/6/2023, 14:11:33
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - hat 5/6/2023, 14:31:58
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Caught Jester 5/6/2023, 15:00:43
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Controllable 5/6/2023, 14:34:13
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Caught Jester 5/6/2023, 15:00:43
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - hat 5/6/2023, 14:31:58
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Rioch for England 5/6/2023, 14:11:33
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - Doctor Ince 5/6/2023, 15:04:11
- Re: Burnley, Drameh - South London Hatter 5/6/2023, 15:28:56
« Back to index | View thread » - Re: Burnley, Drameh - Nick NLPBH 5/6/2023, 13:58:33
Whilst I agree that Potts will not be in the first three centre back positions when all are fit and available, to single him out in the Coventry league game is more than a bit harsh.
NJ, for reasons only known to him, dropped Lockyer for that match and selected a returning Bradley ahead of Lockyer. Unfortunately, Sonny had one of those 'getting back up to speed' games where he didn't react quickly enough and/or make the right decisions so many times early in the game. So much so that Potts was having to cover both his own patch and the space that was being exploited around and behind Bradley ... gradually being drawn more into the centre of the pitch to safeguard Sonny.
When you've got a forward line with Gyokeres and Godden who know how to create space for each other, Potts was made to look poor. If you need to point the finger at anyone for that evening's result and defensive frailties then look no further than NJ.
Despite NJ's brain wobble when selecting the team, if the referee had done his job properly at the end of the game then we would still have gained a win!
Message Thread | This response ↓
The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.