Re: chokes Archived Message Posted by mark on June 12, 2016, 1:42 am, in reply to "Re: chokes" Just checked the article and Jim is correct, M/F only. It does discuss unconventional choke configuration, being slightly flared at the muzzle. Tightest constriction was 1/2" in from the muzzle. Dimensions for the test gun used in the article were: R-.708, L-.692 Message Thread: chokes - Jerry Spinks June 11, 2016, 8:09 am Re: chokes - Jin Stubbendieck June 11, 2016, 9:42 am Re: chokes - erry spinks June 11, 2016, 1:16 pm Value - Jim Stubbendieck June 12, 2016, 2:53 pm Re: Value - jerry spinks June 12, 2016, 4:45 pm Re: chokes - mark June 12, 2016, 12:48 am Re: chokes - mark June 12, 2016, 1:42 am   Searching