Posted by Travis Smith on July 25, 2019, 10:01 pm, in reply to "Re: Earliest No. 00?"
I had thought it was a 1921 field grade from Brophy's book
There are no responses to this message.
« Back to index | View thread »
Post a Response
Optional Image URL:
Optional Link Title:Optional Link URL:
Please enter the numbers above. This helps stop spam.By posting, you confirm that you have read and agree to the board's usage terms.