Re: Burnham
Posted by betosneck


on October 1, 2026, 12:37 pm, in reply to "
Re: Burnham"
|
All he's doing is removing the part which keeps the pension up with other people's wages. Inflation is the one to keep because this is the one that directly affects whether or not you can afford what you afforded last year. As long as the inflation markers are trusted. Giving up that and being able to get care when you get dementia is probably a more than reasonable trade.
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
Burnham - benefitfraudster September 30, 2026, 8:17 pm
- Re: Burnham - Tom Joad October 4, 2026, 8:02 am
- Re: Burnham - G92 October 1, 2026, 9:21 am
- Re: Burnham - Efcman October 1, 2026, 9:26 am
- Re: Burnham - G92 October 1, 2026, 10:28 am
- Re: Burnham - No_One_Ever_Replies October 1, 2026, 2:22 pm
- Re: Burnham - AndyIsOurKing October 1, 2026, 10:43 am
- Re: Burnham - betosneck October 1, 2026, 12:37 pm
- Re: Burnham - No_One_Ever_Replies October 1, 2026, 2:23 pm
- Re: Burnham - McConville1 October 1, 2026, 12:52 pm
- Re: Burnham - gordonlee1 September 30, 2026, 10:53 pm
- Re: Burnham - Est__1878 September 30, 2026, 10:33 pm
- Re: Burnham - Captain Jack September 30, 2026, 9:27 pm
- Re: Burnham - bignev September 30, 2026, 8:24 pm
- Re: Burnham - Essy September 30, 2026, 8:20 pm
- Re: Burnham - WaltonBlue September 30, 2026, 9:55 pm
- Re: Burnham - AndyIsOurKing September 30, 2026, 8:48 pm
- Re: Burnham - benefitfraudster September 30, 2026, 8:23 pm
 « Index | View all » |