Re: Burnham
Posted by G92


on October 1, 2026, 10:28 am, in reply to "
Re: Burnham"
|
I genuinely think he needs to cover his back against the hasn't got a mandate stuff that will be (is being) thrown at him (and to an extent is right as this wasn't in the manifesto) and if he gets the mandate then he (and the country) can crack on, rather than being almost at a standstill which is what I think we will happen over the next couple of years.
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
Burnham - benefitfraudster September 30, 2026, 8:17 pm
- Re: Burnham - Tom Joad October 4, 2026, 8:02 am
- Re: Burnham - G92 October 1, 2026, 9:21 am
- Re: Burnham - Efcman October 1, 2026, 9:26 am
- Re: Burnham - G92 October 1, 2026, 10:28 am
- Re: Burnham - No_One_Ever_Replies October 1, 2026, 2:22 pm
- Re: Burnham - AndyIsOurKing October 1, 2026, 10:43 am
- Re: Burnham - gordonlee1 September 30, 2026, 10:53 pm
- Re: Burnham - Est__1878 September 30, 2026, 10:33 pm
- Re: Burnham - Captain Jack September 30, 2026, 9:27 pm
- Re: Burnham - bignev September 30, 2026, 8:24 pm
- Re: Burnham - Essy September 30, 2026, 8:20 pm
- Re: Burnham - WaltonBlue September 30, 2026, 9:55 pm
- Re: Burnham - AndyIsOurKing September 30, 2026, 8:48 pm
- Re: Burnham - benefitfraudster September 30, 2026, 8:23 pm
 « Index | View all » |