Re: The Post ( Online journalists)
I'm not expecting one,as my email was clear, concise,non abusive, making a point that their reporting was clearly partial.As such it was no better than the abysmal Echo. Asked,how did their 'reporter' (who mis reported the location as Hatton 'Gardens') Arrive at the figure of 'around' 30 Everton fans. Had they questioned the protesters as to their football allegiance? If so what was the allegiance of other protesters? Clearly a complete fabrication,not expecting a response.
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
The Post ( Online journalists) - fourjays August 11, 2025, 2:50 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - Mr OW Bol August 12, 2025, 5:01 am
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - Jack August 11, 2025, 5:39 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - Bainesy003 August 11, 2025, 4:17 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - jajomami August 11, 2025, 4:03 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - fergusduncanson August 11, 2025, 5:55 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - Essy August 11, 2025, 5:36 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - backbingham August 11, 2025, 4:51 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - Wooly August 11, 2025, 4:32 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - efcman4ever August 11, 2025, 4:27 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - McConville1 August 11, 2025, 4:21 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - StringerBellend01 August 11, 2025, 4:14 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - MPTEFC August 11, 2025, 4:11 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - MPTEFC August 11, 2025, 3:47 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - Dirk Hoffman August 11, 2025, 3:32 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - Tonytaxi1970 August 11, 2025, 3:17 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - rookwood August 11, 2025, 3:04 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - jajomami August 11, 2025, 2:52 pm
- Re: The Post ( Online journalists) - EFC1095 August 11, 2025, 2:51 pm
 « Back to index | View thread » |