Re: Armstrong
Posted by Ta La
on July 15, 2025, 11:32 pm, in reply to "
Re: Armstrong"
|
It was you that said Heath was productive and that Armstrong wasn't. I was kind of agreeing by saying that's Heaths main purpose whereas Armstrong is there to primarily protect the defence and/or get the ball into the likes of Heath etc.
|
It's us, not me. Fight inequality.
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
 Armstrong - Est-1878 July 15, 2025, 10:53 pm
- Re: Armstrong - ESCLIP July 16, 2025, 6:48 am
- Re: Armstrong - Vince Noir July 15, 2025, 10:56 pm
- Re: Armstrong - Boom94 July 16, 2025, 8:33 am
- Re: Armstrong - Touching_Cloth July 16, 2025, 8:26 am
- Re: Armstrong - henno05 July 16, 2025, 1:49 am
- Re: Armstrong - Est-1878 July 15, 2025, 10:58 pm
- Re: Armstrong - Vince Noir July 15, 2025, 10:59 pm
- Re: Armstrong - Est-1878 July 15, 2025, 11:02 pm
- Re: Armstrong - Barra6 July 15, 2025, 11:00 pm
- Re: Armstrong - Vince Noir July 15, 2025, 11:08 pm
- Re: Armstrong - Ta La July 15, 2025, 11:17 pm
- Re: Armstrong - Vince Noir July 15, 2025, 11:25 pm
- Re: Armstrong - Stillfeelingbluer July 16, 2025, 7:32 am
- Re: Armstrong - Ta La July 15, 2025, 11:32 pm
- Re: Armstrong - Barra6 July 15, 2025, 11:11 pm
« Back to index | View thread » |