Link: Full article
Ars got hold of a letter addressed to cable provider Telenet, a letter in which compensation and technical crippling of the DVR were demanded. A similar letter went to Belgacom, another cable TV provider. This letter, kindly provided to us by Inside TV International, was jointly written by the CEOs of the three Flemish broadcasters.
The CEOs weren't just making the usual complaints over users time-shifting broadcasts and zipping through commercials. No, DVRs are also blamed for the not-as-successful-as-expected introduction of the broadcasters' own "catch-up" TV services.
In Belgium, on-demand catch-up services are pay-per-view only (unlike the BBC iPlayer or Hulu), and revenues for these services aren't meeting expectations. Needless to say, DVRs allow users to bypass these services if they plan ahead; why pay to watch last night's episode of some drama when it's sitting on your DVR's hard drive?
The introduction of the ability to program a DVR via the Web or a smartphone app has made the problem worse - at least from the perspective of the broadcasters - by making DVR programming just too easy. Newspaper De Morgen was also told that the broadcasters view their product as a TV evening (programs and commercials combined), not just as individual programs. DVRs eviscerate that concept.
The CEOs' letter is scant on solutions. It would have been quite interesting to see their proposals for getting people back to watching the same channel for an entire evening. The removal of the TV's "off" switch would probably help, as would an inability to switch channels after an initial choice is made. Perhaps they could confiscate smartphones, laptops, and tablet computers?
Message Thread
« Back to index