Link: Source
In fact, since the law was passed, total infringing behavior has actually increased by three percent.
Researchers affiliated with the University of Rennes in France's Brittany region have just released a paper based on 2,000 phone surveys with Brittany residents. The survey found that 15 percent of P2P users have already stopped using such networks, even though Hadopi has yet to start sending out its warning letters and disconnection notices.
Good news for rightsholders? Perhaps, as these numbers will certainly skyrocket once the actual penalties are in place. But, in a sign of how the situation is likely to develop later this year, the researchers found that two-thirds of those former P2P users simply migrated to illegal streaming sites and HTTP-based download services.
In other words, Hadopi is the first step in a game of Whack-a-Mole; even as it beats down P2P use, most users transition to similarly illicit services that the "graduated response" regime doesn't touch. The one bit of good news here for rightsholders is that such services are more centralized than P2P networks, and pressure can be more easily brought to bear on a company like Rapidshare than on a distributed network of users.
The increase in non-Hadopi infringement has been larger than the declines in P2P use, suggesting a more general migration to streaming and download sites. This is no doubt because it's easier to find a rogue video site out of China that features one-click streaming of movies and TV shows to the browser than it is to install a P2P client, learn to use it, and then wait for content to arrive.
Message Thread
« Back to index