"[This case] sends a clear message that if you're in a position of influence and power you'll be treated one way and if you're not you'll be treated another way."
The police are also furious.
My best guess is Smollet has friends in the prosecutor's office who worked to get him off the hook with just a symbolic punishment. $10,000 is a pittance for him.
I am suspicious by nature.
Here are my guesses
1. there is a defect in the police investigation. Perhaps a cop messed up a search warrant, there was a problem with questioning and reading of Rights, or any number of minor errors that would be glossed over with a non-celebrity.
I'm thinking possibly something that would just have been tossed out of trial if it have been Bob Nobody, they would have just offered a deal for mr. Nobody.
2. Chain of evidence error. Something has disappeared, somebody messed up evidence - things that if it was a nobody, they would have worked out a plea deal.
3. Error in the prosecutor's office. Somebody messed up so bad they did not want it public.
4. Rahm Emanuel. The mayor ordered it to go away. He has ties to Clinton and Obama.
Personally I believe this is why.
https://chicago.cbslocal.com/2019/03/26/jussie-smollett-charges-dropped/
Another liberal simply above the law.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jussie-smollett-case-brothers-say-empire-actor-paid-them-to-participate-in-alleged-attack-source-says-2019-02-16/
This is the strangest story. Why do these people keep faking hate crimes?
1
Message Thread
« Back to index