
Viking has a "long" package that starts in Amsterdam and ends in Bucharest. The Danube is most of that trip. The vision was to simply unpack in Amsterdam, then depart in Bucharest. Then research showed the reality often was, as you note, bus trips to other ships, sometimes with an overnight hotel stay before going to the next ship the next morning. Depending on how bad all these rivers actually are determines just how many of these bus connections you have to do. And, the longer the trip and more rivers involved, the more likely and numerous the connections. Since I want their biggest package, I am setting myself up for a lot of busing over a three week cruise. Though you're correct that it's still better than a coach tour, just not the ideal imagined.
No rush on this. Water levels might be better later.
Previous Message
we have done 6 river cruises with no problems, if you use VIKING they have so many ships on opposite cruises that if low water stops you a quick packing and bus trip and you continue your cruise on an identical ship in an identical cabin,far far better than a coach tour!
Previous Message
Hate to say it, but I think what actually interests me more is the fact the rivers are so low. Had planned a river cruise for retirement. Glad other things distracted me from scheduling it.
WWII left wrecks all around the world. Hope Serbia gets help, and manages to clear them.
Previous Message
Responses
« Index