
https://en.topwar.ru/18745-nachalo-ispytaniy-raketnogo-kompleksa-club-k.html
The next to last paragraph talks about how it is targeted. Last sentences of that paragraph are:
"For this purpose, the Club-K complex includes combat control modules (MOBU) and power supply and life support (MES). As follows from the available data, in the case of the 40-foot container-based rocket complex, all the modules, including the rocket launcher, are located in a single design. At the same time, the MOBU and MEA can, if necessary, be mounted in separate ISO containers."
In other words, for this particular system, the targeting equipment is contained within a 40 foot container, or could also be added separately.
I am fairly certain our Mk 70 is not like this. The Mk 70 is just the launcher, I believe. So, we either need another container, or a network.
Previous Message
I understand networking Ralph, but my question is can the Russians do that? They certainly don't seem to be displaying that capability in Ukraine.
Dean
Previous Message
Over the horizon targeting would be done through "networking." The current US Navy vision is to have distributed forces all networked together by various data links such that any ship has the "composite picture" generated by all of them. Thus, any vessel with suitable weapons aboard can be selected by any other vessel as a firing platform. Drones and satellites would be the primary links, with drones less susceptible to jamming. There may also be other, classified methods, and how much progress the Navy has made on bringing this vision to reality is also classified. "Local" linking is probably pretty good. More widely distributed assets likely are still not "there yet."
So, an armed patrol icebreaker would (theoretically) be networked to any/every other Navy and Coast Guard ship within hundreds to even thousands of miles around it, and see on its screens "the complete battle space" as an aggregate of all the data from every vessel in the network. It would be in communication link with them all, and software would be able to find and select which platform had the correct weapons and best proximity, and order the launch, all within fractions of a second.
That's the vision. Still "a bit sci-fi" most likely at this point, and actual abilities are classified in any case
Previous Message
Seems pointless to me to have cruise missiles on an icebreaker. If they are actively breaking ice, then they are leading their own ships. Who are they going to fire cruise missiles at? How would they target anything over the horizon? more likely, that incebreaker would be about to experience a MK48 under it's keel.
Dean
Previous Message
Yes, Russia has no icebreaking destroyers or frigates.
In addition to the new Project 23550 (Ivan Papanin) patrol ships, they have apparently still four old Project 97P (Ivan Susanin) patrol ships, which also have icebreaking capabilities. But according to Wikipedia, in case of two of those, the armament was removed. And these are very old ships...
Responses