
Since the carrier group structure is still also very useful and necessary, the new general purpose escort in the form of DDGX was also welcome news to me. It offered future growth which the Burke hull is no longer capable of. Between this upgrade to our carrier groups, and the investement into USVs and UUVs with suitable affordable manned accompanyment, it looked to me like we were on exactly the right track.
Now, there's this thing. If it gets going, it will be the ruin of the US Navy. We barely have enough budget to keep DDGX alive. This will replace it outright. There will be no "still keeping DDGX on the drawing board as a backup." This will tie up our resources on a wild goose chase that won't produce needed near-term results, and as the article noted is most likely to end up canceled, or severely truncated in numbers. Just a waste of time and resources. It kills the general purpose escort program we now need even more desperately to escort this thing on top of our carriers. It is ridiculous.
My former optimism is gone. If I see this thing actually ramp up and get going, then I will abandon what hopes I had. Distributed Lethality by itself is wonderful, but as noted, not enough. The existing carrier force is also necessary. This will destroy that. I may well live to see incompetence (at many levels) destroy the US Navy. It was certainly "fun while it lasted."
Chinese is not a fun language for most westerners to learn. Tonality is an extremely unfamiliar aspect. I suppose I could be dead before that really becomes an absolute necessity. A silver lining in everything.
Previous Message
Here, another interesting article about the BBG(X) aka Defiant class aka Trump class:
The strategic logic and industrial peril of Trump’s battleship plan for the US Navy
The interesting final sentence:
"If industrial realities don’t halt the BB(X) project early on, then it’s quite likely future administrations will cancel, and a contingency plan is needed."
According to the article, the best contingency plan would be to continue the development of the cheaper and fast to built DDG(X).
The article discusses e.g. that this class is an departure of ‘distributed lethality’ concept - which would make the class a high priority target.
Compared to a Chinese Type 055, the BBG(X) cannot ship that much more missiles (16 more cells in the VLS plus the 12 CPS missile launchers), i.e. two Type 055 would be superior. It is high likely that China can built more than two Type 055 (or a future large PLAN destroyer) in the time the US is building one BBG(X).
Responses