The reduced speed allowed first Victorious to close and launch a torpedo attack of which one of eight hit - Lt Philip Gick - which detonated against the starboard armour plate. Lindemann with his skilled helmsman Hansen avoided all the others but the maneuvering cost Bismarck too much time.
The following day fifteen further Swordfish were launched from Ark Royal under atrocious weather conditions and were superbly led to their target by Lt. Cmd T Coode. Attacking from all points and again under intense AAA fire from Bismarck thirteen successfully dropped with two hits, one again against the nickel steel armour (Sub Lt. A Beale) but the other one of the most decisive blows in modern history with Sub Lt J Moffatt's torpedo striking the very end of the port quarter and permanently damaging Bismarck's steering. That was it, all over, Bismarck was going nowhere except in circles and the next day was caught and pounded.
Don't forget the most significant contribution played by the very brave Swordfish pilots and crew of the RN's FAA. Without Moffatt's hit it is very possible that Bismarck would have reached the safety of air cover and a French port.
Perhaps Hood did 'throw a rod' and sink herself, as you can see from her photo she was very long (hull to beam ratio was 8.239/1!) which during her life made her prone to bending stresses and after twenty years and Holland's pursuit/intercept on the day, became too much.
When the evidence changes I'll change my mind and so until Mr Ballard goes back to the middle of nowhere and sends his robot to the depths to find conclusive proof of a major malfunction, it is still Bismarck's hit.
Previous Message
so if she was destroyed by her props that really makes it an even luckier hit!!! and at least they had worked for 20 years unlike Bismarcks 1 trip,
as for 1-0 Bismarck was so damaged by POW that she had to run for home!which she never reached so a score draw??? Previous Message
Great read, thanks for the head's up because I was quite happy to leave it as one lucky hit/good shootin' by Bismarck, and still do!
What precisely is Mr Lawrence infering? That the Battle of Denmark Straight was not Km 1, RN 0, but really a own goal, so we all really can't give the poor old Nazi's anything?
Frothing with revenge, the RN went on a hell-bent-for-leather ship-hunt determined whatever the cost (almost torpedoed one of their own cruisers) to sink the Bismarck, succeeding, and in the process almost killing its entire crew. And with the virtual loss of all of Hood's crew, that's a real lot of men dead because of an absolutely terrible design for a capital ship that should not have been built in the first place and in the end didn't need an enemy to destroy it? War, but too sad!
I'd prefer for commemoration and history's sake just to leave it at 1 - 0 and admire Bismarck's gunnery and the heroic crew of the Hood.
Nevertheless thanks again for the link and also to others who supplied links to this historic naval event. Always a good read. Previous Message
I can't believe I never saw anything about this.
https://historyfirst.com/hms-hood-sunk-by-mechanical-failure-not-bismarck/
https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/Last-Resting-Place-by-Martin-Lawrence/
Responses