[ Post a Response | The SteelNavy.Com Message Board ]
Posted by Ralph Wood on May 25, 2025, 19:49:55, in reply to "Re: Upon study..."
No problem. Thank you.
If all eleven photos are grouped under that title, and all have those two dates associated with them, then 17 December, 1945 is four days after she was awarded to the US, and 17 January, 1946, as already noted, is "on her way" to the US (and those photos should show evidence of her being at sea.) Both dates are then consistent with the title of the group. Knowing now what you know, you might--if you wanted to--be able to go through them and figure them out...which ones were probably shot in Germany on 12/17/45 & which were from 1/17/46 at sea. I suspect from your description this is what happened. Someone put two groups of photos, shot on those two dates, together and titled them that way.
That you just did what you did is both understandable, and great. Now, more sense can probably be made of them.
My thoughts from your description, without seeing all 11 photos. 
Previous Message
When I scanned this series of eleven photos of PRINZ EUGEN "labeled as being turned over to the USN", I had two dates used on the photos and uncertain if all the photos were taken on the same date. With a track record of wrong locations and dates with 80-G photos, I just wrote what was on the caption. I had not researched the ship's movements at that point and didn't pursue the matter further (not a priority with my research interests). Previous Message
You wrote, "A summary of her movements on the "kbismarck.com" website doesn't help in matching the first photo with photos."
However, in the movements which you cite is this item...
"13 January 1946: Leaves for Boston with a mixed crew of Germans and Americans."
If the first of your photos is actually located still in Bremerhaven, then the correct date would be 17 December, 1945. By January 17th, 1946, she is at sea, headed for Boston, having left on the 13th (four days before) and arriving 22 January, 1946.
No? Previous Message
I don't know the answer of the "exact" paint colors used, but from photos, she was repainted sometime from her turn over to the USN and her "trip" to Bikini. The ships paint looked pretty battered in December 1945. They kept the same basic graded scheme. The first image below appears in NARA USN 80-G files in two places with two different dates. (80-G is notorious about NOT having accurate dates for photos) I have not tried to track down the exact date. A summary of her movements on the "kbismarck.com" website doesn't help in matching the first photo with photos.
08 May 1945: The Prinz Eugen is handed over to the British.
26 May 1945: Leaves Copenhagen with Nürnberg, and sails to Wilhelmshaven escorted by British cruisers Dido and Devonshire arriving on the 28th. Once in Wilhelmshaven enters dry dock.
(Note; on 13 December 1945, Prinz Eugen was awarded to the US)
05 January 1946: The American flag is hoisted and the ship put into service in the US Navy as USS Prinz Eugen (IX-300).
13 January 1946: Leaves for Boston with a mixed crew of Germans and Americans.
22 January 1946: Arrives in Boston. Shortly after moves to Philadelphia where the barrels of turret "Anton" are removed.
March 1946: Leaves for the Pacific through the Panama Canal.
01 May 1946: In San Diego, the last German crew members leave the ship. Dispatched to Bikini Atoll in the Marshalls.
01 July 1946: A-bomb test Able. At 0900, a nuclear bomb dropped over a target fleet of ships by a B-29 detonates at 518 feet above the surface. Prinz Eugen is located 1,194 yards from the point of explosion and survives the test undamaged.
Previous Message
Here is an account of what the ship went through after the war:
https://wwiiafterwwii.wordpress.com/2015/06/23/uss-prinz-eugen/
While it did spend extensive time in US Navy yards, I am not sure it was ever repainted. No specific mention is made in the article of that happening. There are black and white photos of it, and the paint scheme doesn't look altered.
That said, under "Destruction of USS Prinz Eugen" in the link above is printed:
"Professional to the end, the remaining Germans onboard repainted the SCR-584 haze grey so the Army OD green would not stick out."
That was an Army radar brought aboard, described in the text. The Germans decided to paint it. The article does not specify whether they used possible stocks of German paint which might have been aboard, or US Navy paint, and "haze gray" is enough of a "generic layman's term" for a warship paint job that there is ambiguity in how the author means that. Another possibility is that, while the overall ship might have been in German paint, the Germans used US paint, feeling it was better than the Army OD color. If you look at DKM and US late-war neutral gray colors, there are close smiliarities. A US gray color might have been "less offensive" to their sensibilities than OD.
Also--as noted in the article--markings were painted on the hull to judge listing after the blasts.
So, except for one highly ambiguous little detail, and some markings, I have found no other mention of a big repainting. It seems if they knew they were going to sink it, they would not have bothered to paint it all up? I have found nothing conclusive, and allow for the possibility it was, but personally feel they did not. That is only my opinion, for the little it is worth. Previous Message
after commissioning as IX-300 and expended at Bikini? If so, what scheme?
Responses