Given his historical actions it seems rather presumptuous to claim that D'Oyly-Hughes could have managed the tactical situation off Samar; any attempt to launder D'Oyly-Hughes' reputation founders on the circumstances surrounding the loss of his entire command.
Likewise, to assert that Acasta's lucky torpedo hit on Scharnhorst somehow relieves D'Oyly-Hughes of responsibility for the disaster is patently ridiculous.
I suggest you hit a few of the more reputable books (Haarr, Winton, Whitley, for example) on the issue before you make such absurd statements.
RS
Responses