The rest of what you write here is correct enough. Trumpeter Yorktown and Enterprise uppers are better than the Trumpeter Hornet, so it is possible to use them to correct the Hornet kit in a waterline configuration. Previous Message
The upper Academy hull in 1/700 is that of Trumpeter Hornet. I don’t use lower hulls. But if I am reading everybody’s complaints properly the upper hull was just a bad as the lower hull on Trumpeter Hornet. The Trumpeter Enterprise and Yorktown has a slender upper hull as compared to Trumpeter Hornet.
It is possible to create a better waterline Hornet of Doolittle Raid using the Trumpeter Enterprise hull. The flight deck forward and aft would have to be modified. Some 20mm tubs removed. Use the Trumpeter island or if Model Monkey offers one. A bit easier if you wish to do a Hornet of Santa Cruz as gun mounts of Enterprise and Hornet almost mirrored each other. Previous Message
Which Trumpeter...the Trumpeter Hornet, or the new Trumpeter Enterprise? Do you own the Academy kit? (I do.)
Folks can judge for themselves simply by reading reviews:
The Trumpeter Hornet kit, which also contains a comparison of bow shape to the Tamiya kit:
http://www.modelwarships.com/reviews/ships/cv/cv-08/700-trum/trumpeter-review.html
The Academy Enterprise kit:
http://www.modelwarships.com/reviews/ships/cv/cv-06/Enterprise-700-Academy/academy-review.html
In particular, one can compare lower hull bow shapes.
The Trumpeter:
http://www.modelwarships.com/reviews/ships/cv/cv-08/700-trum/hornet-02f.jpg
The Academy:
http://www.modelwarships.com/reviews/ships/cv/cv-06/Enterprise-700-Academy/Enterprise-02p.jpg
Notice how long and slender the Enterprise hull is, and the bulbous forefoot?
So, I am not sure how you are basing your claim. Previous Message
Forget it. The Academy Enterprise hull is that of Trumpeter.
Responses