[ Post a Response | The SteelNavy.Com Message Board ]
Re: Renwal Kits
Posted by Rick on October 9, 2020, 14:14:33, in reply to "Renwal Kits
I absolutely agree that Renwal was lightyears ahead of others with the detail they put into small AA and bulkheaddetail. I loved the North Carolina and CVA kits and could not understand why Revell couldn't match them by 1965 or so. And the the AKA, AKA and AG - they were terrific! Which is to say that any accuracy faults in them were too subtle for me to recognize. Flat bottoms were a fact of life and it took me years to dislike that.
I agree that the CLG kit was almost accurate and extra 6" turrets made it a fair kit. But the "King" - nope. Individual weapons problems or not, It just didn't come very close to much of anything in Jane's Fighting Ships.
We are most definitely in a Golden Age now, when we can pick the manufacturer whose engineering priorities most closely match our priorities. And if we want to complain, there are so many dimensions to complain about that you can spend all of your modeling time writing to dozens of forums and enthusiast pages about why you are not pleased.
Life is good!
Rick, how can you disparage Renwal kits? After all the the box top showed precision measuring instruments and measuring pad, how can they be in error? Who else in the dawn of plastic modeling had individual Oerlikons with guns shields? Their North Carolina Class kit had them, just don't look to closely at the helicopter on the quarterdeck. However, compare the Renwal Oerlikons with the Steve McQueen blobs on the Revell Iowa Class kits.
SteelNavy.Com Home Page