The video doesn't lie. And refusing to ID is not against the law, it is not considered disorderly conduct. Furthermore, Disorderly conduct can't be used to criminalize constitutionally protected activity. I've presented the video, and why does it not match up with the written report from the officer? It sure isn't because the video lied. I didn't act up. If you also notice the documents I uploaded, it states that the officers can't give preferential treatment.

Right from their own policy and procedure manual:

Exhibiting partiality for or against and individual or group because of race, creed, gender or influence constitutes un-officer like conduct; conduct unbecoming an officer.

I was treated with impartiality against someone with "influence" based on her position in government. She was the only one yelling. Has anyone bothered to even call her and ask her for a list of the types or categories of records she has? Then ask her why she doesn't have such a list? See how you get treated. None of you have even bothered to look into what happened, I present evidence and you just automatically believe the word of the police which contradict the video. Patrich's credibility is gone.