How many times have these sore loser quacks cried impeachment?
They have been talking about impeachment since Day One. It has always been their plan because it is the only plan they have.
"But people putting money on the line are taking impeachment seriously. According to the prediction market Betfair, the chance that Trump will fail to serve out his four-year term is about 50 percent (!). There’s even a 20 to 25 percent probability (!!) that Trump doesn’t finish out 2017 in office, these bettors reckon."
Gone by the end of 2017?
We know who is behind all this: Barack Obama.
He is the man (for lack of a better word) who planted that Russian Dossier on President-Elect Trump during a security briefing. That planted dossier led to the Mueller investigation that hobbled the Trump presidency.
For nearly 3 years, Obama has used his followers to throw everything they could at President Trump to distract attention to the many successes that President Trump has had -- successes that underscore what an utter incompetent and failure Obama was.
"Barack Obama is turning his new home in the posh Kalorama section of the nation's capital - just two miles away from the White House -- into the nerve center of the mounting insurgency against his successor, President Donald J. Trump.
"Obama's goal, according to a close family friend, is to oust Trump from the presidency either by forcing his resignation or through his impeachment.
"And Obama is being aided in his political crusade by his longtime consigliere, Valerie Jarrett, who has moved into the 8,200-square-foot, $5.3-million Kaloroma mansion with the former president and Michelle Obama, long time best friends.
"Jarrett played a vital -- if at times low-key -- role in the Obama presidency. She lived in the White House, dined with the Obamas, and help shape his domestic and foreign policies."
Under Obama, the Democrat Party has become a Racketeer Influence Corrupt Organization. Maybe it always was, it just got better at it.
President Trump may be their Rudy Giuliani, the man who brought down both Marc Rich (a major Democrat donor who sold Iranian oil despite an embargo) and the Genovese and Colombo crime families. Never forget that Rich (pardoned by Clinton for a million bucks) and defeating the Mob are the reasons Democrats hate him.
"But Trump mentioning CrowdStrike, that’s the firm that examined the DNC server after it was hacked in 2015, everybody thinking that the Russians did it. The FBI never examined it. We don’t know who hacked the server. We don’t know that there was a hack. We don’t know that it wasn’t an inside job to release some of the data on that Democrat National Committee server, whoever tried to hack the RNC computers. But they never got into theirs, but the DNC was hacked."
CrowdStrike is owned by Google, which is evil and a branch of the Democrat party
The DNC hired it through Perkins Coie, the Seattle-based law firm that Hillary used to hire Fusion GPS. CrowdStrike had a role in trying to frame President Trump with that Russian Collusion nonsense.
When Trump mentioned CrowdStrike to the Ukrainian president — do not doubt me — what he was really asking, because he specified the business of Biden and his son, he’s really asking the president of Ukraine to help Barr in the investigation of when the Trump-Russia collusion investigation actually began. That’s what Trump wants to know. That’s what Barr is trying to find out."
These are the details of Obama's attack on Donald John Trump. Ego alone (as large as it is) no longer is his motivation. Self-preservation is. There are truths that as president, Donald Trump has access to.
The media seems to be ignorant if this. When he tweeted Obama wiretapped him, the media said "without evidence." As if.
Obama wants to reverse the 2016 election by any means necessary. This week he decided to roll with impeachment. His post-presidential sedition is unprecedented and unAmerican.
Hillary merely refuses to accept defeat.
Pelosi wanders the House aimlessly.
Obama seeks to undermine the presidency and the nation herself.
And so we have this constant turmoil, this political drama, and this constant talk of impeachment. His true believers are worn out because Obama overlooked Rule 8 of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals:
"A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag."
When it comes, impeachment will be Obamacare II.
Democrats may pay the price at the polls.
I did a lot of research for this post that I discarded because it was too much detail. But here are the initial things they threw out there for impeachment.
1. "White House website promotes Melania Trump's modeling and jewelry line," as reported in the Washington Post on Inauguration Day.
2. "CREW sues over Trump emoluments." This Fake Watchdog group said on January 22, 2017, "Since Trump refused to divest from his businesses, he is now getting cash and favors from foreign governments, through guests and events at his hotels, leases in his buildings, and valuable real estate deals abroad. Trump does business with countries like China, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, and now that he is President, his company’s acceptance of any benefits from the governments of those countries violates the Constitution. When Trump the president sits down to negotiate trade deals with these countries, the American people will have no way of knowing whether he will also be thinking about the profits of Trump the businessman."
3. The Hill reported on February 1, 2017, "Rep. Joaquín Castro (D-Texas) says Congress should consider impeaching President Trump if he orders federal agencies to ignore a judge's stay on parts of his controversial immigration order.
"If Trump orders U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to ignore a federal judge’s emergency stay, Castro told BuzzFeed that lawmakers should begin the process of censuring and potentially impeaching Trump.
There should be a resolution of censure,' he said. 'And if he does it again, there should be articles of impeachment.
4. Bloomberg News reported in March 7, 2017, "Trump's wiretap tweets raise the risk of impeachment."
The story said, "The sitting president has accused his predecessor of an act that could have gotten the past president impeached. That's not your ordinary exercise of free speech. If the accusation were true, and President Barack Obama ordered a warrantless wiretap of Donald Trump during the campaign, the scandal would be of Watergate-level proportions.
"But if the allegation is not true and is unsupported by evidence, that too should be a scandal on a major scale. This is the kind of accusation that, taken as part of a broader course of conduct, could get the current president impeached."
They are low life rat ba###### but they are not quitters