Posted by Tom A on 9/14/2011, 10:48 pm, in reply to "Ed Tech Study"
204.195.96.67
I agree with you Denise. For me the major factors here are the enormous amount of time, money, and training required to fully maximize the use of technology in the classroom. As a science teacher I recently attended an NSTA convention and was amazed at the incredible array of technological tools available for use in the teaching of science. The difficulty however is coming up with the funds as well as the time required to learn how to effectively implement these technologies in to my curriculum. I agree that schools need to make technology more of a priority.
--Previous Message--
:
: The article “Study: Ed Tech has proven
: effective- But more needs to be done for
: technology to reach its full potential in
: schools” by Laura Ascione, provides many
: interesting and true points about the
: effectiveness of technology in education. It
: is true that technology in the public
: schools is not where it should be. It takes
: an enormous amount of time, resources and
: education for teachers to effectively
: implement and incorporate technology into
: their daily lessons. Districts need to
: provide teachers with the time to develop
: their technology skills and the time to
: actively collaborate with their colleagues.
: Once teachers develop their technology
: skills in depth, then collaboration with
: colleagues is key to the integration of this
: technology. Districts and schools vary
: within the amount of resources they have,
: thus infringing on the level of integration
: into the curriculum. I believe that once
: districts make technology a priority, then
: teachers will follow. The article stated
: that “ …the real potential of technology for
: improving learning remains largely untapped
: in schools today”. The effects on staff
: time, budgeting, professional development
: and the redesign of curriculum all need to
: be taken into account before technology in
: education can show its true potential.
:
:
Responses