Posted by channy
on 10/19/2007, 6:11 pm, in reply to "Re: A simple solution"
68.57.141.247
I guess whether it is simpler and/or easier is a matter of opinion. In my opinion looking at a list printed out before the game and picking out the people that have the lowest points is a whole lot easier than: Top 2 rule apply? Do people move up if somebody leaves? Does 4th place ever get to advance? How many wilds do I need? Who subs lucky dog or is there a person that didnt play in first round that gets to advance first?. We also say this is suppose to be a tourney for fun and by letting winners and the people with lowest points advance the good players and the not so good players playing time I believe would be more equal. Boy that last sentence was long I hope it made sense. I think this issue needs to be discussed with all people and if decided to leave as is fine and if not work out rule or rules for subs/advancement favorable for the majority.(another long sentence LOL). I have also heard talk about the same people winning the leaderboard all the time. I could definitely be wrong but I think by letting only the winners and low points people advance the totals would be closer together. I would guess there are other people out there with ideas and maybe we could try each way for say a month and see how people like each one and than vote. If you read this tell other players to voice their opinions. If they dont want to post on message board send an email to Drunkie.
--Previous Message--
: Well, I think your idea is great, however, I
: dont see how its any easier. I mean, you
: need to check each player present & find
: their standing on the LB. That does Not seem
: like a simple task.
: Correct me if Im wrong here..
:
:
:
Message Thread:
« Back to thread