Posted by Wymark on 9/21/2009, 4:44 pm, in reply to "yes that's true and good question and here is my answer.."
82.23.179.222
if wymark thinks it's all about money
Except I clearly said that class was basically about a person's relationship to the means of production, but that the term can be quite nebulous - not that it was 'all about money'. I never even suggested that. So you're arguing with a strawman.
'Identity', or the experiences that shape it, can play a part I suppose, but then within each class you'll find people with widely differing 'indentities' and widely different experiences. So it isn't particularly useful as a determinant or indicator in and of itself. In fact it's positively vague.
I'm still failing to see what exactly your point was, nevemind why class was relevant to it.
Message Thread:
« Back to thread