Re: Trail runners or boots up South Fork?
Posted by Doogie man on October 31, 2009, 21:04:38, in reply to "Trail runners or boots up South Fork?"
72.220.247.23
might be ok up to dry lake but mutch further I dont know. --Previous Message-- : Prepping for an overnighter up South : Fork to Lodgepole, the with a trip : the next day to the summit and back. : Wondering if my New Balance trail : runners are gonna cut it, or do I : break out the boots? Packing about : 35 pounds to Lodgepole, then just a : daypack to the summit. :
|
|
Message Thread:
- Trail runners or boots up South Fork? - michael magno October 31, 2009, 19:28:16
- Re: Trail runners or boots up South Fork? - KW November 9, 2009, 16:17:45
- Re: Trail runners or boots up South Fork? - yucaipatim November 9, 2009, 12:31:14
- Re: Trail runners or boots up South Fork? - Phil R November 1, 2009, 10:21:37
- Re: Trail runners or boots up South Fork? - Wayne November 1, 2009, 5:03:20
- Re: Trail runners or boots up South Fork? - Hikin' Jim November 1, 2009, 0:57:38
- Re: Trail runners or boots up South Fork? - Jeff S October 31, 2009, 21:20:31
- Re: Trail runners or boots up South Fork? - Doogie man October 31, 2009, 21:04:38
 « Back to thread
|