
Posted by boIsextraOrdinAre
![]()
on August 23, 2009, 2:39 pm
I'm a Boston University graduate (B.A., English) with a poor GPA - hair above a 2.0.
About a year ago, I entertained the possibility of going to law school, took the LSAT and hit a score in the high 170s, whereupon I learned I could get admitted to virtually any school, on the following grounds:
Law Schools are fastidiously concerned with their standing in US News' Top Schools publication. A major portion of the ranking a school receives is, naturally, related to its incoming class' academic profile.
Now I would have thought Academic Profile comprised GPA averaged, or somehow balanced, with LSAT score.
This is not the case, however. Law schools report to US News either a student's GPA or LSAT, based on which is higher. There is no averaging, and consequently a well-rounded student with a 4.0 and 160-something LSAT would, under normal circumstances, be trumped by a student with a 4.7 GPA and a low LSAT, or a student with a low GPA and near-perfect LSAT.
I almost applied to top-tier law schools but had a change of heart as I very seriously don't want to pursue law.
II.
Right now I'm entertaining the idea of getting my MBA.
I want to know if a high GMAT score will get me into a Top 10 school.
Secondly, I'm desirous to know if graduating from a Top 10 school will dramatically benefit my career.
It's unfortunate that titles count for so much in the job market; I wish it were a true meritocracy here, but it isn't. Several ultra-bright friends of mine with MBAs from BU are getting paid much less than their counterparts who came from top-ranked schools.
Apparently, graduating with a business degree from a Top 10 guarantees you a job starting at circa 250k first year.
III.
What do you guys think about what I've written? What are your experiences? Is what I'm saying right or wrong?
I need any and all feedback at this time!
Thanks in Advance,
Kaveh
Responses: