Forest presumably looking at the full six points if their breach is a similar size?
But presumably the focus of our appeal was that it was disproportionate.
The focus of our second appeal should be that it’s double jeapordy.
I sincerely hope that the second charge anticipates future appeals and to me it seems that Forest should now get a 6 point deduction and we should get 2, given that we can only be tried on a proportion of the period in question.
Confirmed nt
Responses